Bing Blogs

Bing Blogs

This is a place devoted to giving you deeper insight
into the news, trends, people and technology behind Bing.

Search Blog

Oct
29
20 08

"I don't need ten blue links — just give me the answer!"

There are really just two types of searches:

  • Browse and seek  We want to browse for our best fit when we type "I want to learn how to speak Spanish."
  • Tell me now  I just want my question answered when I search for how tall Mount Kilimanjaro is or who the 31st president of the U.S. was.

We've been working hard on the "Tell me now" type of search, or as we Live Search boffins call it, "instant answers." Instant answers show up at the top of your search results, offering the most relevant information we have to answer the direct or implied question in a query. We have quite a few currently on Live Search. Have you tried any of these?

  • Encyclopedia  Search for an encyclopedic fact, like "How tall is mount Everest," "When was Lincoln born," "What is the GDP of Poland," "What's the population of Georgia," "Who won super bowl 30," or " What won best picture in 1998." You ask, and Live Search will return the exact answer to your question. And for you trivia fans, they are: "8,850 m / 29,035 ft," "February 12, 1809," "$303,228,550,000 (2005)," "4,630,841 (2008 estimate)," "Dallas Cowboys, NFC," and "Shakespeare in Love."
  • Traffic  Just type "traffic" in the search box at Live Search and see a map of your area with green, yellow, red, and black highlights for the major highways. WOOHOO! Live Search won't make the traffic go away, but at least it can tell you when it's time to stay late and work on those TPS reports so you won't waste time idling in the fast lane.

Image of Redmond traffic answer on Live Search

  • Horoscope  Just type "horoscope" and your zodiac sign to get your daily dose of direction. I guess I need to "take my situation step by step and before I know it my problem will be solved."

Check this blog in a month to find out about other cool new instant answers on Live Search.

Theo Vachovsky, Product Manager, Live Search

Comments

  • Is this feature only working in the US? If I try the examples here in Austria I get the usual search results.

    Thanks.

  • That's strange; I remember the Traffic Instant Answer used to have a slightly larger map, and you could even zoom with your mouse's scroll wheel. I wonder what happened?

    I hope you guys improve #1 much more too.

  • Feature doesn't work in Canada either.  Actually, over all, Live Search Canada barely works.  What's up with that?

  • Great feature. Thanks for the great stuff.

  • Whoever seriously expects an _answer_ by typing something into a textbox labeled "search", should think again or better find the textbox labeled "ask/question" before complaining about blue links.

    (Would green or purple links make you feel better anyway?)

    Why does MS demand on doing lots of different stuff with one Textbox for user input?

    Is there some kind of philosophy behind this? Does it make Live feel more "magical" to its users?

    Why doesnt microsoft split up live into two sections, one for searching terms and one for answering questions? Search XOR Ask!

    Google has dozens of different applications for finding (or answering) different kinds of stuff (books, maps, anything, ...).

    This way, one could progressivly increase the quality of both tasks separatelly and more safely/easily than relying on one single user input string, which is difficult to classify and fully depends on its contextual meaning.

  • eline sağlık çok güzel bir yazı olmuş thanks

  • I like the idea behind getting the best result as quickly as possible - however the is the slight little problem of choice - this is why the ten blue line work, imho.

    If the search engine does not give me what I am looking for the first time in the way of results or choice that answers my question - I will go somewhere else.

    Has this simple lesson inside MS been forgotten already?  You gave us results that were not answering the questions - we got Google instead...