This is a place devoted to giving you deeper insight
into the news, trends, people and technology behind Bing.
Late last week I bumped into David Flink, one of our Lead Program Managers here at Bing and after a brief chat, he agreed to write this week's blog post detailing a view on implementing paganation solutions. He's even agreed to field questions, so feel free to post up with questions related to this blog post and David can chime in with answers.
Traditionally, Bing has relied on a set of heuristics to determine if and how individual pages on a site are related to each other. Now, through the use of the optional rel="next" and rel="prev" link elements, you can provide Bing with a strong indication of the structure and scope of the sequenced content on your site. For example, think about content spanning multiple pages, such as forum threads, or time-sequenced content such as news articles and blog posts. Using the rel="next" and rel="prev" link elements, you have full control over the sequencing of your pages. Let’s examine the following example: The use of rel="next" and rel="prev" link elements for an oldest-to-newest sequence In this example, the webmaster has determined that his user prefer to read news articles from oldest to newest. The webmaster has reflected this order in the implementation of the rel="next" and rel="prev" link elements, with the rel="next" link elements pointing to a newer article on the site. Note that although it is perfectly acceptable to maintain multiple sequences on your site – for example, one sequence for news, one for politics, and one for finance – we encourage you to avoid adding more than one rel="next" and more than one rel="prev" link element to your pages. Now let’s review this alternative implementation of the rel="next" and rel="prev" link elements for blogs: The use of rel="next" and rel="prev" link elements for a newest-to-oldest sequence The universally preferred order for blog posts is newest to oldest. In the example above, this order has been reflected in the implementation of the rel="next" and rel="prev" link elements, with the rel="next" link elements pointing to older blog posts on the site. As in the previous example, the first page in the sequence features just the rel="next" link element, while the last page in the sequence features just the rel="prev" link element. Avoid looping the sequence back to an index page on the last natural page of the sequence (using, for example, <link rel="next" href="index.aspx">), as this obscures the sequence. Multi-Page Content
Once you have settled on one or more sequences, it’s important to keep multi-page content in mind. A user reading page 1 of a multi-page article will expect the next item in the sequence to be page 2, not a newer article. Review this example: The use of rel="next" and rel="prev" link elements for an oldest-to-newest sequence with multi-page content We strongly encourage you to prioritize sequencing for multi-paged content over all other sequences to ensure a predictable user experience. Eager To Get Started?
Implementing the rel="next" and rel="prev" link elements is a relatively straight-forward process. These pointers will help you successfully complete the implementation:
Implementing these rel="next" and rel="prev" link elements doesn't trigger a new visual treatment for your pages on our search result pages. It does, however, allow us to more comprehensively understand and index your content. If you have any questions regarding the implementation of these link elements to your site, please feel free to add them the comments section below.
This looks the same as the google implimentation, is that correct or is there any differences?
If i have a 3 page artcile and a user searches for content that is on page 3, what will rank, page 1 or page 3. I would like the user to come to page 1 via the search engine even though the actual keywords may have been on page 3, is that hiw it works
@Alan: It's similar, but it's not quite the same. There are two key differences: At Bing, we use the rel="next" and rel="prev" link elements to gain a deeper understanding of a site's paginated and sequenced content. We do not have data to suggest sending users to the first page of a thread (when really they're looking for a piece of information mentioned on the third page of a thread) is beneficial to the user experience. That said, we may use our newly gained knowledge on your site's structure to provide easy access to other sections of the paginated or sequenced content from our results pages in the future.
Second, we believe in a single application of the <link rel="canonical"> element, which is to provide a pointer to the preferred URL for the page content.
Thanks for your question!
Great post, last night only i read this post googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/.../video-about-pagination-with-relnext-and.html and was wondering what's bing's take on it..good to know that bing is on it as well...
Google typically send users to the first page in a paginated series, but this isn't always the case. For example, if the keyword was only present on page 3, Google would send them to page 3. However, for someone searching for e.g. "Men's shoes" and you've got a series of pages showing all shoes for men, that's a clear example where someone searching for "men's shoes" should be sent to the first page by default.
Will Bing be takin rel="me" or rel="author" into heavy consideration within your algorythm? It's seems that google is.
@David: Can you elaborate on the sentence below please. I'm not sure I understand you correctly.
"Second, we believe in a single application of the element, which is to provide a pointer to the preferred URL for the page content."
© 2013 Microsoft