Lollipop bags at centre of trade dress claim
US confectionery manufacturer Spangler’s Candy Company has sued Tootsie Roll Industries for infringing the trade dress of its lollipop bags.
Spangler filed its complaint at the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio’s Western Division on Friday, May 18.
The plaintiff’s Dum Dums lollipops are sold in red bags with the brand name in white letters and a display window showing the product. A yellow oval located on the right side of the bag covers a portion of the display window and has large blue numerals. This packaging represents the trade dress for the Dum Dums.
“The combination of colours of the bag; location of the display window; and location, shape and colour of the oval with the numerals creatives a distinctive trade dress that is identified with Dum Dums lollipops,” said the claim.
According to Spangler, its Dum Dums were the only lollipop to have a bag whose primary colour was red before Tootsie infringed the trade dress this year.
“In 2018, Spangler was alerted by a buyer from one of its retail customers that Tootsie had copied Spangler’s trade dress and had begun selling Charms Mini Pops in a bag that closely resembles Spangler’s bag for its Dum Dums lollipops,” the claim said.
According to Spangler, Tootise “copied” the trade dress in question to package its Charms Mini Pops in a way that is “deceptively and confusingly similar” to the Dum Dums bag.
The claim alleged that Tootsie developed a bag that has “several graphic elements” that are similar to the trade dress in question. When used in combination, they allegedly create the same overall visual impression as Spangler’s trade dress.
The elements that allegedly infringe the trade dress include a red bag, white letters and a display window in a similar location.
“When Tootsie’s Charms Mini Pops bags are placed alongside Spangler’s Dum Dums bag, customers are likely to confuse the product and their source of origin,” according to Spangler.
Spangler also alleged that Tootsie’s yellow pallet boxes are infringing its pallet display trade dress and are “deceptively and confusingly similar”.
Tootsie is being sued for trade dress infringement and unfair competition. Spangler is seeking damages and injunctive relief.
Did you enjoy reading this story? Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox.
Today’s top stories
Orrick welcomes two patent lawyers from Weil Lex Machina: Delaware the new favourite for patent filing Hogan Lovells appoints global head of IP
Judge approves $43m Spotify copyright settlement Fiction versus reality: Viacom win over Krusty Krab restaurant affirmed
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk