Accountants bear brunt of limited licence

20 November 2017
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

The unnecessarily arduous application process for limited licensees have meant limited licensees have been at a disadvantage compared to full licensees, a law firm said.

The Fold Legal wrote in a blog that ever since the accountants’ limited licence regime was introduced, accountants had lost the ability to appoint responsible managers who do not have three years’ regulated experience due to a policy change by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) for financial services relating to self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs).

Solicitor director, Jaime Lumsden Kelly, said this was at odds with ASIC policy for full licensees who could appoint responsible managers using a broad range of experience, such as those who are competent in general insurance because of unregulated reinsurance experience.

“The inconsistency has created a huge issue for licensed accountants with RMs who wish to retire, or have fallen ill unexpectedly,” she wrote.

“If an accountant needs to change their RM before the third anniversary of their licence, they will need to contract someone to fill that role, because no new RMs will now meet ASIC’s competency requirements for SMSFs prior to that date.”

ASIC’s decision to change the “tax advice exemption” for licensees has also had an impact on licensed accountants and their employees,” Lumsden Kelly said.

Previously any person could provide tax advice without holding an Australian financial services licence (AFSL) even if it was also a financial product advice because the exemption meant tax advice was treated as if it was not a financial service at all.

“While ASIC correctly identified that a licensee would not be able to comply with this exemption, because they could not make a statement that they were “not licensed”, in attempting to solve that problem, new problems were created,” Lumsden Kelly said.

“ASIC could have simply solved this conundrum by modifying the disclosure – ‘this advice is not subject to financial services regulatory protection’ would have been sufficient.”

Accountants operating under the limited licence regime would be most affected because it had created significant inconsistencies in the treatment of tax advice between licensed and unlicensed accountants.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND