As the appeal of a former commander of the rebel group Ulimo, of his
2022 war crimes conviction enters its final days, defence lawyers for Kunti Kamara
called on the three judge panel and nine jurors to overturn the conviction saying there is
a lack of evidence Mr Kamara committed the crimes.
According to Mr Kamara’s lawyers, his earlier sentence of life imprisonment should not be
upheld because the evidence provided by prosecutors and civil parties is largely based
on the unreliable testimonies of victims and witnesses from events that happened 30
years ago.
Unlike in English/American based judicial systems including Liberia, where
the prosecution must convince the jury of the defendant’s guilt “beyond a reasonable
doubt”, prosecutors in the French system must convince the jurors that they have an
innate belief that the defendant is guilty.
Unlike the English-based system where the jury needs to be “unanimous” – meaning
juror must agree – for a conviction, the French system just needs a simple majority – 7
of the 12 judges and jurors must find him guilty.
|
---|
Read also:Convicted Ulimo war criminal Kunti Kamara’s appeal begins
The defence has tried to persuade the jury that they – an all white jury – cannot have
enough confidence in the evidence to sentence a man to 30 years in prison only based
on the testimonies of people remembering traumatic events from 30 years ago.
“I am asking you that Mr. Kamara should be acquitted after this hearing. I am asking
you to acquit him because the proceeding is not rigorous,” Marilyn Secci, the lead
defence lawyer for Mr Kamara told the jury.
Ms Secci cautioned the jury that they should not be carried away with sympathy for the
extraordinary experiences described by the victims, urging them to base their verdict on
evidence.
She cited two rape incidents explained by two of the witnesses, arguing that
prosecutors had not proved Mr Kamara was the perpetrator of the rapes.
Ms Secchi said Mr Kamara should not be held as an accomplice of the crimes of rape since he
was not the one who raped the two women.
She argued that the two victims who testified did not say Mr Kamara was the one who
directly raped them, but instead another Ulimo commander who she claimed Mr Kamara
may have not had control over. She also pointed out there there is no forensic evidence – no
corpses or medical evidence – to prove what the victims were saying.
Ms Secci pointed to one witness who earlier testified before the court that six young men
were killed by Mr Kamara and other soldiers and their corpses were dumped into a well
near the Foya Market.
She argued the prosecutors did not provide forensic investigation
to establish the corpses of the six victims alleged to have been dumped in the well were
true.
In another plea on the charges of murder, Ms Secci countered prosecution witnesses
testimonies which she told the court were marred by inconsistencies. She was referring
to the murder of a schoolteacher and a woman that witnesses had earlier claimed
Mr Kamara shot, and killed, and her corpse set ablaze being accused of her being a witch.
“We heard six witnesses who told this court that they were not on the scene at the time
(the man) was killed, but all said that when (he) was killed, his heart was removed and
that Kamara and other commanders ate (his) heart”, is not credible.”
About the looting of the generator from the Borma Hospital, Mr Kamara’s lawyers also told
the court that there was no research report to refer to that was done by the Swedish
organization containing information about the looting of the hospital or that
the generator was looted. They contended that there is also no evidence to link their
client to the looting.
“We see many variations, we, therefore, call on this court to say to the declaration by
(another witness) on the death of six men killed and thrown into a well,” Ms Secci said. “We
also want you to say no to an allegation of the women’s murder, there is no death
certificate or any evidence to link Kamara.”
Ms Secci told the court they find it difficult to understand how a court would apprehend their
client when there is nothing that proves the argument of the presence of Mr Kamara in the
places told by witnesses.
Mr Kamara in the earlier weeks of this appeal had told the court that he was not based in
Foya, but instead on the frontline in Menikoma, where he said he was leading Ulimo
fighters to push back the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) rebels which had links with
Charles Taylor’s National Patriotic Front of Liberia, (NPFL) fighters from taking over
Foya.
However, almost all the prosecution witnesses, including two defence witnesses, had
confirmed before the court that Mr Kamara was based in Foya.
Following the defence lawyers’ presentation of their plea in favor of the accused, they
then asked that the sentence of life of imprisonment handed down by the first jury in
2022, be rejected and Mr Kamara be set free.
Referring to the Gibril Massaquoi acquittal by the Finnish court, who was acquitted
following his war crimes conviction due to the lack of sufficient evidence provided by the
prosecutor in Jaunary, Mr Kamara’s defence lawyers pleaded with the court to do the
same.
Gibril Massaquoi is a Sierra Leonean man who was accused of war crimes in Liberia.
“We cannot generalize what Ulimo did in Foya to what Mr. Kamara did,” Ms Secci said. “We
are not here in the trial of Ulimo, we are not here in the trial of all the crimes that were
committed in Liberia, but we are here in the trial of one man- Kunti Kamara,” Ms Secchi told
the Tuesday.
The trial continues Wednesday with the jury deliberation.
This story was a collaboration with New Narratives as part of the West Africa
Justice Reporting Project.
Support PREMIUM TIMES' journalism of integrity and credibility
At Premium Times, we firmly believe in the importance of high-quality journalism. Recognizing that not everyone can afford costly news subscriptions, we are dedicated to delivering meticulously researched, fact-checked news that remains freely accessible to all.
Whether you turn to Premium Times for daily updates, in-depth investigations into pressing national issues, or entertaining trending stories, we value your readership.
It’s essential to acknowledge that news production incurs expenses, and we take pride in never placing our stories behind a prohibitive paywall.
Would you consider supporting us with a modest contribution on a monthly basis to help maintain our commitment to free, accessible news?
Make ContributionTEXT AD: Call Willie - +2348098788999