Royal family’s cancer diagnoses echo Queen Elizabeth’s ‘annus horribilis’

When the late Queen Elizabeth stood up to give a speech marking 40 years on the throne, in June 1992, she conceded to the assembled dignitaries, and the watching nation, that her family had had an “annus horribilis”.

The phrase came to be remembered as an acknowledgment that even the staunchly dutiful monarch, who rarely betrayed emotion, had felt the cumulative effects of a series of blows.

Yet the past 12 months have surely been marked out as ranking among the most traumatic for Britain’s royal family in living memory.

In 1992, the revelations included the release of salacious details about the troubled private lives of Diana and Charles, the Prince and Princess of Wales; the separation of the queen’s son Prince Andrew and the divorce of the queen’s daughter, Princess Anne, and the fire that had raged through Windsor Castle.

‘I could rent an apartment, but why?’ The teenager who lives on Germany’s high-speed trains

---

Quashing of Harvey Weinstein’s rape conviction draws prompt parallels with Donald Trump trial

---

Germany’s alleged coup: An aristocrat, an astrologer and an army officer go on trial for high treason

---

Putin seems ‘very happy’ but Russia’s advantage in Ukraine is narrowing

---

The queen’s unusually frank admission was followed by a yet more tumultuous period: five years later, Diana died in a car crash, casting a deep shadow over the lives of Prince William and his brother, Prince Harry.

[ Britain’s Princess of Wales Kate Middleton announces she is being treated for cancer ]

Recent months have brought a furore about the manipulation of a picture of Princess Kate with her children, which set social media aflame with outlandish conspiracy theories after weeks of speculation about the much-loved princess’s health.

The princess’s admission to hospital was announced in January, on the same day as King Charles’s diagnosis with an unspecified cancer.

The lack of detail about either’s condition, and the royal family’s silence during the ensuing weeks and then months, fed a sense that the public had not been told the whole story.

Friday’s statement addresses the legitimate concerns about transparency head-on, explaining that her condition was initially believed not to be cancerous and that she and Prince William wanted time to explain the news to their children. Her diagnosis, and the king’s, came less than a year after the lavish ceremony at Westminster Abbey in which the king was anointed, at the age of 74, by the Archbishop of Canterbury, and which the family may have hoped would usher in a new era of stability.

A few months earlier the then Prince of Wales, Charles, had led mourners at his mother’s funeral, after hundreds of thousands of members of the public queued through the night and around the block to pay homage to her coffin, amid an outpouring of grief.

Family tensions and troubles were evident even at the time of the funeral. Prince Andrew did not wear military uniform as he walked behind his mother’s coffin, after having been stripped of his royal duties in the wake of claims of sexual abuse made in a US court case, which he has always denied.

Prince Harry returned for the funeral of his beloved grandmother, but his presence only served to underline his semi-detached status.

Just a few months earlier, in January, he had published a brutally revealing memoir, Spare, which included allegations that he and his brother had once come to blows, as well as less-than-edifying details about losing his virginity.

Prince Harry has also continued to fight a series of very public court cases against the British press, which serve to remind the public of his fraught status. He has also been battling the government in court — unsuccessfully — over whether the taxpayer should foot the bill for his security when he visits the UK.

King Charles’s brother, Prince Andrew, continues to be an ongoing source of humiliation, with a forthcoming Netflix drama set to rehash the devastating Emily Maitlis interview in which he was questioned about his friendship with the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

King Charles had barely had time to establish himself as reigning monarch, the post he had waited his life to occupy, before his diagnosis forced him to reduce his public duties.

For William and Kate, however, all these tribulations, which have chipped away at the monarchy’s air of unflappable majesty, are likely to pale into insignificance alongside the daunting family drama they now face, in the glare of the public eye.