Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Monday, April 15, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

Europe and its angry farmers: A story as old as the EU

European farmers, as in the past, are in revolt and making sure politicians hear their voices amid the tumult of war, economic change and superpower rivalry.

(CN) — Tractors blocking roads and laying siege to government buildings. Cow dung and animal herds turned into weapons of protest. Sign-waving farmers seething against change and global markets. Cowering politicians giving in to the demands of peasants in revolt over economic hardship.

This is the plot this year in Europe — a drama remarkably reminiscent of other key moments in the turbulent 70-year history of the European Union, a project to integrate the European continent into an economic zone where goods and people move freely across borders.

“What's happening now is not new,” said Venus Bivar, a historian at the University of Oxford and author of “Organic Resistance: The Struggle over Industrial Farming in Postwar France.”

“Farmers in France have been protesting regularly with varying degrees of intensity since the 1950s and they've been protesting about exactly the same things for 75 years at this point,” Bivar said.

It's not just French farmers who've taken to the barricades this year to revolt over perennial gripes: low market prices, inadequate subsidies, red tape and government mandates.

Across the EU, farmers have been throwing dung — literally and rhetorically — at technocrats in Brussels and blocking roads with their tractors in Italy, Spain, Germany, Greece, Poland, Romania, Belgium, the Netherlands and, of course, France.

And, as in the past, they are winning concessions — at least, as in the past, in the short term. Since a wave of protests started in January, EU bureaucrats and national governments have delayed, nixed or scaled back a crop of environmental rules linked to the EU's Green Deal meant to foster biodiversity and tackle climate change.

A story as old as the EU

Violent farmer protests have been a feature of European politics ever since six European nations began unifying their economies into a single market with the 1957 Treaty of Rome.

In developing a customs-free economic zone across Western Europe, one of the thorniest areas was agriculture.

Postwar Europe, still haunted by food rationing and starvation caused by the war, wanted to ensure it had enough food to feed itself, so getting a policy on agriculture right was fundamental. The loss of colonies and a booming postwar population added to the urgency of boosting food production.

In this equation, any deal to integrate the economies of Germany and France — erstwhile enemies — meant, in effect, a grand bargain between the two powers.

They struck a deal: Germany got access to sell its industrial goods in France, and in exchange Germans agreed to help pay to keep farmers in France, Europe's breadbasket, plowing their fields.

“The French government knew it had this big problem on its hands,” Bivar said. “It had one of the larger agricultural populations in Europe at the end of the war and it had to do something with it.”

So, in the talks around forming the common market, “France played that card,” Bivar said. “The Germans advocated for industrial interests and the French advocated for agricultural interests and compromises were arrived at.”

Back in the countryside, though, French peasants, especially those running smaller poultry and dairy farms, were angry as they struggled to modernize, racked up debts and faced the prospect of bankruptcy in Europe's emerging customs-free agricultural market, which favored larger operations.

A farmer in Savigny-lès-Beaune, Burgundy, harvesting wine grapes in 1965. (Louis Falquet/Wikimedia Commons via Courthouse News)

In February 1960, violent demonstrations erupted in Amiens against French President Charles de Gaulle's efforts to force farmers to become more efficient. More than 25,000 farmers took to the streets and clashed with police as they threw eggs, tomatoes and rocks. Police responded with tear gas and water cannons. In the violence, about 100 farmers and 55 officers were injured.

A set of scenes was about to repeat itself again and again.

ADVERTISEMENT

A recipe for anger: Europe pushes for farm industrialization

By 1962, Brussels began rolling out its solution for European farmers and consumers: The Common Agricultural Policy, or CAP, a flagship program in the development of an integrated European market.

CAP set up a complex, and costly, system of subsidies, price support mechanisms, rural development and protections against cheap imports. It was, in effect, a welfare system for farmers and a mechanism to stabilize prices across the bloc.

But even as it was put in place, Sicco Mansholt, a Dutch farmer and Europe's first agriculture commissioner credited as “the father of CAP,” predicted trouble lay ahead.

Unless CAP was overhauled, Europe's farmers, he argued, would produce far too much food under this generous system of price supports and yet continue to struggle financially. Brussels also was worried about a ballooning CAP budget.

Mansholt's solution was radical: Through industrialization, modernization and consolidation, he drew up a plan to push up to 5 million of Europe's smaller farmers off the land through retraining programs and early retirement and reduce the land under cultivation by about 12 million acres. He talked about the need for Europe to keep pace with global trends and adopt the American model of industrialized farming.

“It was very controversial,” said Katja Seidel, a historian at the University of Westminster in London who has written about CAP.

As details of Mansholt's plans emerged in 1968, protests broke out in Brussels with farmers from across Europe clashing fiercely with police over the next few years.

Farmers protest on March 23, 1971, in Brussels against agricultural reforms advocated by Sicco Mansholt, the European agriculture commissioner at the time. Farmers were deeply upset over Mansholt's plans to industrialize farming in Europe and reduce the number of farms and farmers. (Dutch National Archives/Wikimedia Commons via Courthouse News)

“You had really quite violent protests,” Seidel said. “You had one person who died in the altercations.”

The protests and stiff opposition from farmers unions and their allies among national politicians forced Mansholt to extensively scale back his plans, leaving in place most price support mechanisms.

Still, politicians encouraged modernization and consolidation too. The flow of subsidies from Brussels favored bigger operations, so European farms grew bigger and more productive. In turn, the number of farmers declined dramatically. Between 1955 and 1975, between 40,000 and 50,000 farms disappeared every year in France.

“The Mansholt Plan proposed industrialization and it realized industrialization to a large degree,” said Jan Douwe van der Ploeg, a Dutch rural sociologist. “This is reflected in the fact that 80% of the CAP payments go to only 20% of the farms — the largest ones, the most industrialized ones.”

Sure enough, Mansholt's predictions came true: With farmers guaranteed to get paid for what they produced, they churned out as much as their farms could yield.

“If products were not sold, the (European) Commission would buy them off farmers and store them,” Seidel said. “That's where the food mountains came in in the '70s and '80s.”Gl

Globalization ushers in new era of protests

Brussels, then, had a new problem on its hands: Oversupply.

The combination of industrialization and generous subsidies created huge stockpiles — what were dubbed “wine and dairy lakes” and “butter and beef mountains.”

When surpluses couldn't be sold in Europe, they were put into huge storage warehouses, shipped off to countries outside the bloc and even destroyed.

This system kept the farmers who remained in business relatively happy — and mostly off the barricades — though it meant consumers paid more and left Europe looking uncaring as food piled up in warehouses in Germany, Belgium and France while millions of people starved around the planet.

“That was all very harmful for the image of the EU abroad,” Seidel said.

By 1985, CAP was gobbling up about 73% of the EU's budget and the bloc's protectionist model had fallen foul of global free trade rules, specifically talks around the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, a precursor to the World Trade Organization. Those promoting globalization cast as villains the European farmers receiving compensation when they sold their products at a loss outside of Europe.

ADVERTISEMENT

In 1990, the United States applied pressure on the EU to scrap its price support system or face a trade war. Reforming CAP, then, once again became the talk of Brussels.

And sure enough, along with the talk of farm reforms came protests.

In December 1990, as American and European negotiators held free-trade talks, about 30,000 European farmers descended on Brussels. They tried to storm the European Parliament building, tore trees and traffic signs out of the ground along the Belgian capital's streets and raged against police who fired tear gas at the protesters.

The demonstrations, though, didn't halt the reforms. In 1992 CAP underwent a major overhaul. This time, Brussels wanted to both trim the CAP budget and bring the EU into line with new global trade rules.

Instead of propping up markets with guaranteed prices, CAP set up a labyrinthine system of direct payments to farmers. In this new arrangement, farmers were paid to keep land fallow, cut down herd sizes, retire early and comply with environmental rules. Price supports weren't entirely abandoned, though they would be drastically cut for cereals and beef.

“The idea was to maintain this population in the countryside,” said Kalliopi Geronymaki, a historian at the University of Florence who researches agriculture policy. “It turned into rurality rather than agriculture.”

By the 1990s, farming in Europe was dominated by agribusiness. Small farmers didn't have to continue producing for the sake of food security, Geronymaki said.

With American and European negotiators putting the final touches on their trade talks, about 80,000 farmers descended on Strasbourg, France, in December 1992 to protest the free-trade deal. They set fire to effigies of Ray MacSharry, the EU agriculture commissioner behind the new CAP reforms, and clashed with riot police. Several injuries were reported.

As intended, the MacSharry reforms caused prices for grain, beef and other goods to fall, aligning more with prices on the world market. EU funds for CAP also declined. Today, agriculture makes up about a quarter of the EU budget, or about 55 billion euros a year.

After the reforms, the number of farms continued to shrink, though many of those that stayed in business grew and gobbled up ever more CAP funds.

European farmers turn into perennial protesters

Throughout the 1990s, EU farmers fought the subsidy cuts and new system of payments.

In November 1997, Italian dairy farmers blocked railways with their trucks and tried to unload sheep in central Rome to protest huge fines imposed on them by the EU for exceeding milk production quotas.

The following winter, French farmers staged a protest by bringing cows to the Eiffel Tower. The next summer, about 5,000 French farmers (along with chickens, ducks and sheep) returned to the Eiffel Tower and held a protest against globalization by picnicking and savoring Bordeaux wine, foie gras and goat cheese.

In December 1999, Brussels was the scene of mass demonstrations — and violent clashes with police — with up to 40,000 farmers from across the bloc joining ranks to decry cuts to subsidies.

Meanwhile, Brussels also upset farmers in former communist countries, such as Poland, as it pushed to industrialize agriculture in Central and Eastern Europe and force them to scrap import duties as a condition to joining the EU. In one such protest in July 1998, farmers in Warsaw scuffled with police, who fired tear gas.

In February 2001, Brussels was besieged by farmers demanding help to cope with an outbreak of mad cow disease. Hundreds of tractors blocked roads and police dispersed farmers storming the EU headquarters with water cannons.

And the protests continued.

In September 2009, Belgian farmers dumped about 3 million liters of milk in fields in protest over low dairy prices. The following month, around 1,000 tractors rumbled into Brussels, poured milk onto the streets and blockaded the EU headquarters. Buckling to the pressure, Brussels provided dairy farmers a 280 million euro relief package.

Dairy farmers were back on the streets of Brussels in 2012, spraying the European Parliament and riot police in milk. Similar scenes cropped up in September 2015 as prices plummeted following Russia's ban on food imports from the EU — in retaliation for the bloc's sanctions against Moscow over its illegal annexation of Crimea. Farmers from across the bloc blocked roads with about 1,450 tractors, lit tires on fire and hurled eggs at police. Once again, the EU bailed them out with 500 million euros in aid.

And the scenes of angry farmers riding tractors in protest through Brussels will be repeated again.

On Tuesday, the Farmers Defence Force, a Dutch group of right-wing activist farmers opposed to the EU's Green Deal rules, announced plans for a mass protest in Brussels on June 4, a few days before EU-wide elections will pick a new European Parliament.

Rising anti-green sentiment, as exemplified by the farmer protests this year, is expected to be among the reasons why the parliament may shift toward the far right, putting the EU's Green Deal in jeopardy.

“The attack on our freedom, our rights and our businesses must end,” the Farmers Defence Force proclaimed in its call to protest on June 4. “Take action against the sham that is the Green Deal, climate policy and nature legislation.”

Courthouse News reporter Cain Burdeau is based in the European Union.

Follow @cainburdeau
Categories / Economy, Environment, Government, International, Politics

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Loading...