Skip to content
NOWCAST News 9 at 7:30
Watch on Demand
Advertisement

Proposed education funding amendment would increase aid, impose local spending limits

Critics say proposal would bring back 'donor towns'

Proposed education funding amendment would increase aid, impose local spending limits

Critics say proposal would bring back 'donor towns'

WMUR POLITICAL DIRECTOR ADAM SEXTON EXPLAINS. CALLED OUT IN LAST YEAR’S SUPERIOR COURT RULING THAT DEEMED STATE EDUCATION FUNDING UNCONSTITUTIONALLY LOW, LEGISLATOR ARE BRINGING FORWARD A NEW PLAN. CURRENTLY, STATE AID TO COVER THE BASE PER PUPIL COST OF AN ADEQUATE EDUCATION IS SET AT JUST OVER $4,000. HOUSE REPUBLICANS ON THE FINANCE COMMITTEE PROPOSED RAISING THAT FIGURE TO THE RECOMMENDED $7,300 PER PUPIL, BUT THEY ALSO WANT TO REWORK THE STATEWIDE EDUCATION PROPERTY TAX IN A WAY THAT WOULD IMPOSE LIMITS ON LOCAL EDUCATION SPENDING. UH, THREE YEAR, UH, CEILING ON SPENDING. CURRENTLY, IT HAS TO DO ALLOWS INCREASES BY THE CONSUMER PRICE INDEX OR BY A TWO THIRDS VOTE OF THE DISTRICT’S LEGISLATURE. THE IDEA OF THE STATE PUTTING UP A BARRIER TO INCREASE LOCAL SPENDING ON SCHOOLS IS BEING MET WITH RESISTANCE. THE SPENDING CAPS SUBSTITUTES YOUR JUDGMENT FOR THE JUDGMENT OF MY BUDGET COMMITTEE, MY SCHOOL BOARD AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, MY DISTRICT. AND, UH, I DON’T WANT THAT. I WANT MY LOCAL CONTROL. OTHERS BALKED AT THE RETURN OF SO-CALLED DONOR TOWNS THAT WOULD SEE THEIR EDUCATION TAX DOLLARS REDISTRIBUTED AROUND THE STATE. THAT BASIC CONCEPT IS FUNDAMENTALLY WRONG, AND AT ODDS WITH HOW CITIES AND TOWNS IN NEW HAMPSHIRE HAVE GOVERNED THEMSELVES FOR CENTURIES. NOTHING ABOUT THIS ISSUE IS EASY, AND LAWMAKERS ARE GETTING KUDOS JUST FOR MAKING THE ATTEMPT. BUT OPPOSITION TO THIS AMENDMENT IS SIGNIFICANT AND BIPARTISAN. THIS PROPOSAL WILL LOCK IN THE GREAT DISPARITIES THAT CURRENTLY
Advertisement
Proposed education funding amendment would increase aid, impose local spending limits

Critics say proposal would bring back 'donor towns'

Education funding is going back under the microscope at the New Hampshire State House, with some lawmakers making a move to bring funding up to levels recommended by a Superior Court judge last year, but with new restrictions on spending at the local level.Called out in last year's Superior Court ruling that deemed state education funding unconstitutionally low, legislators are bringing forward a new plan.Currently, state aid to cover the base per-pupil cost of an adequate education is set at $4,100. House Republicans on the Finance Committee proposed raising that figure to the court-recommended $7,356.01 per pupil, but they also want to rework the statewide education property tax in a way that would impose limits on local education spending. >> Download the free WMUR app to get updates on the go: Apple | Google Play <<"A three-year ceiling on spending," said state Rep. Tracy Emerick, R-Hampton. "It has to allow increases by consumer price index or by a two-thirds vote of the district's legislature."The idea of the state putting up a barrier to increased local spending on schools is being met with resistance."The spending cap substitutes your judgment for the judgment of my budget committee, my school board and, most importantly, my district," said Tom Enright, of the Hollis-Brookline Cooperative School District. "I don't want that. I want my local control."Others balked at the return of so-called "donor towns," which would see their education tax dollars redistributed around the state."That basic concept is fundamentally wrong and at odds with how cities and towns in New Hampshire have governed themselves for centuries," said Mark Decoteau, of Education Coalition Communities.Lawmakers are getting kudos just for making an attempt to address the difficult issue, but the opposition to the amendment is significant and bipartisan."This proposal will lock in the great disparities that currently exist," said Doug Hall, of Chichester.

Education funding is going back under the microscope at the New Hampshire State House, with some lawmakers making a move to bring funding up to levels recommended by a Superior Court judge last year, but with new restrictions on spending at the local level.

Called out in last year's Superior Court ruling that deemed state education funding unconstitutionally low, legislators are bringing forward a new plan.

Advertisement

Currently, state aid to cover the base per-pupil cost of an adequate education is set at $4,100. House Republicans on the Finance Committee proposed raising that figure to the court-recommended $7,356.01 per pupil, but they also want to rework the statewide education property tax in a way that would impose limits on local education spending.

>> Download the free WMUR app to get updates on the go: Apple | Google Play <<

"A three-year ceiling on spending," said state Rep. Tracy Emerick, R-Hampton. "It has to allow increases by consumer price index or by a two-thirds vote of the district's legislature."

The idea of the state putting up a barrier to increased local spending on schools is being met with resistance.

"The spending cap substitutes your judgment for the judgment of my budget committee, my school board and, most importantly, my district," said Tom Enright, of the Hollis-Brookline Cooperative School District. "I don't want that. I want my local control."

Others balked at the return of so-called "donor towns," which would see their education tax dollars redistributed around the state.

"That basic concept is fundamentally wrong and at odds with how cities and towns in New Hampshire have governed themselves for centuries," said Mark Decoteau, of Education Coalition Communities.

Lawmakers are getting kudos just for making an attempt to address the difficult issue, but the opposition to the amendment is significant and bipartisan.

"This proposal will lock in the great disparities that currently exist," said Doug Hall, of Chichester.