Subscribe

Shocker: Wealthy Americans tend to flee high-income tax states

record

Study spanning 110 years confirms high earners, faced with too-high tax hikes, migrate to more tax-friendly jurisdictions.

In another demonstration of real-world unintended consequences, a new academic study makes a strong case that when it comes to state-level income taxes, too much can be a bad thing.

The analysis spanning 110 years of income tax history in the United States, which was published in the American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, suggests a correlation between state income tax levels and the migration patterns of affluent Americans.

While taxmen may focus on higher-income earners in a bid to raise revenue equitably, the researchers uncovered a trend of higher earners relocating to states boasting lower or nonexistent income taxes.

The first-ever examination of state-level tax policies between 1900 and 2010, which also analyzed US census data sets, showed that states that boosted income taxes saw per capita revenue increases of between 12 percent and 17 percent. However, these gains did not translate into higher total government revenues as a result of the out-migration of wealthy citizens in the aftermath of World War II.

“Personal income tax means a tax upon labor income, first introduced for the purpose of redistribution of wealth,” said Ugo Antonio Troiano, one of the report’s co-authors, an economist and associate professor at the University of California, Riverside, who specializes in economics and politics.

The study found many wealthy Americans did not stand for higher taxation, instead using their higher incomes to move to more tax-friendly jurisdictions.

Compared to migrations between European countries, Troiano cited several factors that grease the wheels of mobility within the US, mainly the use of English from coast to coast. Interestingly, the trend of out-migration began to taper off in the 1980s.

State income taxes in the US had a rocky start, with pre-World War II attempts to introduce them facing legal challenges in Pennsylvania and other states. At present, there are six holdout states that have not introduced permanent individual income taxes, including Texas, Florida, Nevada, Washington, Wyoming, and South Dakota.

Troiano said the fact that wealthier Americans pack up and leave when income taxes get too high, but stay put when income tax hikes were minimal, offers a lesson to policymakers looking to adopt progressive tax measures.

“Raising taxes too much might backfire, as the state might lose too many relatively wealthy contributors,” he said.

Here’s why an interval fund might be right for you

Related Topics: , , , ,

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

EP Wealth scores sports-focused advisors from RBC

The fee-only RIA’s newest advisors in California cater to high-net-worth individuals and athletes at the pro and college levels.

SEIA eyes expansion with largest-ever acquisition

The independent RIA’s deal for a Cleveland-based firm with $2B in assets would mark its maiden expansion into the American Midwest.

Janney expands Eastern US profile with veteran advisors

The ex-Baird advisor in North Carolina and the Wells Fargo alum in Maryland, who together reported managing more than $600M.

Michael Nathanson named new Focus CEO

After several months as president, Nathanson is taking over the chief exec position at the wealth advisory giant from Dan Glaser.

Unwanted crypto gifts a headache for bitcoin ETF firms

Handcuffed by regulation, crypto ETF issuers are stuck with virtual assets that inadvertently made their way into their wallets.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print