A gas pipeline running through Georgia was yesterday being operated again by BP - although two oil routes which also run through the country remain closed.
The energy giant confirmed it began pumping gas into the Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum, or South Caucasus, pipeline, which runs from the Caspian Sea through Georgia into Turkey.
BP had stopped using the pipeline, which has a capacity of 8.8 billion cubic metres of gas per year, on Tuesday because of security fears.
The decision to reopen the line followed an agreement between Russia and its smaller neighbour on Tuesday for a French-brokered cease fire to end a dispute that began over two pro-Russian breakaway territories.
BP said its Baku-Supsa oil pipeline, which runs through the centre of Georgia from Baku in Azerbaijan to Supsa on Georgia's Black Sea coast, remained closed as the company continued to assess the security situation.
The Baku-Supsa route was also shut down on Tuesday after reopening just a few weeks ago following 18 months of inaction. It has the capacity to pump up to 150,000 barrels a day, but has recently been pumping around 90,000 barrels a day.
Another pipeline, the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan route, is out of action after a fire earlier this month on the Turkish section of the line. Kurdish rebels took responsibility.
The BTC pipeline usually provides around one million barrels of Caspian crude oil to international markets. BP said it has no evidence Russian forces attempted to bomb the line, despite accusations by Georgian officials.
Engineers from Turkey's state-owned Botas International Ltd, which operates the affected section of the BTC line, are still reviewing the extent of the damage.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article