Former Australian government adviser raped colleague in parliament, judge finds

Political staffer Bruce Lehrmann has always denied having sex with Brittany Higgins in 2019 - and filed a defamation claim against Australian media company Network Ten over an interview with his accuser in 2021.

Bruce Lehrmann arrives at the Federal Court of Australia. Pic: Reuters
Image: Bruce Lehrmann outside Australia's Federal Court in Sydney. Pic: AAP Image/Bianca De Marchi via Reuters
Why you can trust Sky News

A former government adviser raped a colleague inside a ministerial office, a judge has ruled in a defamation case in Australia.

Bruce Lehrmann was accused of raping Brittany Higgins at Parliament House in Canberra in March 2019, after they had both been out drinking and clubbing with colleagues.

A criminal trial over the claim collapsed in 2022 after a juror was found conducting individual research into the case, and a proposed retrial was abandoned after prosecutors feared it would severely harm Ms Higgins' mental health.

However, Mr Lehrmann filed a defamation claim against Australian media company Network Ten over an interview in 2021 with his accuser Ms Higgins, who waived her right to anonymity during the initial criminal trial.

On Monday, Justice Michael Lee of Australia's Federal Court dismissed Mr Lehrmann's defamation claim, finding he had raped Ms Higgins and told "deliberate lies".

In an Australian civil trial, the standard of proof is on the balance of probabilities, while a criminal trial requires evidence beyond all reasonable doubt.

Justice Lee said in his ruling: "I am satisfied that it is more likely than not that Mr Lehrmann's state of mind was such that he was so intent upon gratification to be indifferent to Ms Higgins' consent and hence went ahead with sexual intercourse without caring whether she consented."

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

The Network Ten interview with Ms Higgins did not name Mr Lehrmann, but the judge found he had been identified based on other details provided on the programme.

"Having escaped the lion's den, Mr Lehrmann made the mistake of coming back for his hat," the judge said in his judgment, referring to the claimant's decision to file the defamation case following the collapse of the criminal trial.

The judge added a ruling on legal costs, estimated to be millions of dollars, will be made later this month.

"This judgment is a triumph for truth," a spokesperson for Network Ten said in a statement.

Read more from Sky News:
Who is the 'hero' officer who stopped Sydney attacker?
Failed attack was 'double defeat' for Iran, Cameron says

Be the first to get Breaking News

Install the Sky News app for free

Mr Lehrmann - who has always denied any wrongdoing - made no comment to reporters as he left the court.

In the criminal trial he pleaded not guilty to one charge of sexual intercourse without consent and denied that any sexual activity occurred.