U.S. Auto Brand Sales Results - April 2015 YTD: Almost As Good As Expected
A predicted 6% increase in April 2015 auto sales ended up as a 5% year-over-year boost, equal to nearly 65,000 more sales last month than in the same period one year ago.
The biggest gains among volume brands were produced by Jeep (with its best-ever month and a 20% increase to 71,759 April sales), GMC (another no-car brand), and Subaru.
Honda, Volkswagen, and Kia all posted slight losses, however, and the gains produced by big brands like Toyota, Hyundai, and Chevrolet weren’t all that significant. Ford, the best-selling auto brand in America, was up 5%. General Motors’, the top-selling manufacturer, increased 6% despite the third Buick decline in four months.
Industry-wide sales were strengthened by SUVs and crossovers. All of the category’s top 20 sellers posted improved sales, year-over-year.
AutomakerApril 2015April 2014% Change2015 YTD2014 YTD% ChangeAcura 14,87414,1225.3%54,51852,0704.7%Alfa Romeo 38——255——Audi 16,82715,6537.5%56,92550,88111.9%BMW 26,95225,0526.9%105,44497,5798.1%Buick 18,22419,214-5.2%68,72172,112-4.7%Cadillac 15,80113,90013.7%52,97653,488-1.0%Chevrolet 187,837181,6483.4%664,393634,3314.7%Chrysler 27,70421,967 26.1%109,63794,45016.1%Dodge 44,90653,463-16.0%168,417198,687-15.2%Fiat 3,7564,298-12.6%14,79415,723-5.9%Ford 213,518203,5524.9%783,940762,2092.9%GMC 47,19439,31420.0%167,005143,78216.2%Honda 115,194118,334-2.7%409,493405,7400.9%Hyundai 68,009 66,1072.9%240,038226,1206.2%Infiniti 9,979 9,1708.8%43,821 40,3918.5%Jaguar 1,0791,0354.3% 5,4155,750-5.8%Jeep 71,75959,754 20.1%250,508205,59321.8%Kia 53,28253,676 -0.7%194,382186,6824.1%Land Rover 5,311 4,53317.2% 22,287 17,61226.5%Lexus 25,87623,16511.7%103,05688,25016.8%Lincoln 8,1346,80319.6%29,61228,4064.2%Maserati 1,06096410.0%2,9893,332-10.3%Mazda 24,12322,4347.5%102,167100,4911.7%Mercedes-Benz 29,18825,887 12.8% 107,344 98,501 9.0% Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 2,7642,394 15.5% 8,323 7,018 18.6% Total Mercedes-Benz 31,95228,28113.0%115,667105,5199.6%Mini 5,4764,39024.7%18,25313,04739.9%Mitsubishi 8,2166,542 25.6%32,00626,38221.3%Nissan 99,869 94,7645.4%433,655418,5093.6%Porsche 5,2174,07228.1%16,64714,20817.2%Ram 40,86439,170 4.3%151,270140,1637.9%Scion 4,3095,386-20.0%16,28719,843-17.9%Smart 4801,048-54.2%2,0133,285-38.7%Subaru 47,24140,08317.9%178,522152,47117.1%Toyota 173,144171,1091.2%659,606612,5647.7%Volkswagen 30,00930,831-2.7%109,248118,154-7.5%Volvo 4,3814,635-5.5%18,10318,333-1.3%————— ——BMW-Mini 32,42829,5929.6%123,697110,62611.8%FCA/Chrysler Group189,027178,652 5.8%694,881654,6166.2%Daimler 32,43229,32910.6%117,680108,8048.2%Ford Motor Company 221,652210,3555.4%813,552790,6152.9%General Motors 269,056254,0765.9%953,095903,7135.5%Honda Motor Company 130,068132,456-1.8%464,011 457,8101.4%Hyundai-Kia 121,291119,7831.3% 434,420412,8025.2%Jaguar-Land Rover 6,3905,56814.8%27,702 23,36218.6%Nissan Motor Company 109,848103,9345.7%477,476458,9004.0%Toyota Motor Corporation203,329199,660 1.8%778,949 720,6578.1%Volkswagen Group * 52,29550,765 3.0%183,602184,102-2.7%———————Industry Total **1,455,242 1,390,769 4.6% 5,411,707 5,134,781 5.4%* Volkswagen Group includes sales figures for Audi, Bentley, Porsche, and Volkswagen brands.
** Industry total takes into account Automotive News estimates for brands such as Tesla (1700 April units) and other low-volume, high-priced manufacturers.
Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar.
More by Timothy Cain
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Slavuta Motor Trend"Although the interior appears more upscale, sit in it a while and you notice the grainy plastics and conventional design. The doors sound tinny, the small strip of buttons in the center stack flexes, and the rear seats are on the firm side (but we dig the ability to recline). Most frustrating were the repeated Apple CarPlay glitches that seemed to slow down the apps running through it."
- Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
- JLGOLDEN When this and Hornet were revealed, I expected BOTH to quickly become best-sellers for their brands. They look great, and seem like interesting and fun alternatives in a crowded market. Alas, ambitious pricing is a bridge too far...
- Zerofoo Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.
- JLGOLDEN I disagree with the author's comment on the current Murano's "annoying CVT". Murano's CVT does not fake shifts like some CVTs attempt, therefore does not cause shift shock or driveline harshness while fumbling between set ratios. Murano's CVT feels genuinely smooth and lets the (great-sounding V6) engine sing and zing along pleasantly.
Comments
Join the conversation
Another good month for Mustang double digit sales again.
@Lou_BC, The thread is becoming rather long. No, HDs will not benefit more, unless they are driven more. Using CAFE the car is the vehicle that will benefit most from lighter weights. Cars must meet more stringent FE requirements than any other class of vehicle in the US under CAFE. Cars only produce a 3% profit, so aluminium is out of the question due to the chance of gaining a return or making a loss. Plus the US only needs to grab Asian and Euro platforms that already produce the desired FE targets. Engines/drivetrains exist externally to the US. HDs fall outside of pickups in that their 8 500lbs attracts a different system of FE evaluation, similar to how the EU measures it's vehicles. Under CAFE 1/2 ton pickups are given a lax formula in comparison to cars. This allow for the use of larger engines. The HD formula is even more lax. It's almost a sliding scale as vehicles get larger in the US. I'd bet the driver behind the F-150 being chosen is primarily driven by the profits it attracts. Also, pickup design isn't that complex in comparison to a car. So, a pickup would of been easier to produce. It's odd that more business orientated vehicles are adopting a different system, closer to what is used in the EU.