The Supreme Court's ruling on universal injunctions is not the end of all expansive injunctions, but it does end a legal weapon for opponents of Trump's agenda.

The justices seldom hear arguments in cases on their emergency docket, and they rarely hold special argument sessions. And they usually know the precise question before them.

Donald Trump’s attorney general struggled to explain the new rules on birthright citizenship after the Supreme Court ruling.

A decision by the Supreme Court’s 6-3 conservative majority could have far-reaching consequences for campaign spending in the United States, undermining the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, a law passed by Congress more than 50 years ago to limit the amount of money that can be spent on behalf of candidates.