The universe may be dominated by particles that break causality and move faster than light, new paper suggests

A delicate sphere of gas created by a supernova blast wave 160,000 light-years from Earth.
A delicate sphere of gas created by a supernova blast wave 160,000 light-years from Earth. (Image credit: NASA Goddard)

Could the cosmos be dominated by particles that move faster than the speed of light? This model of the universe agrees surprisingly well with observations, a pair of physicists has discovered.

In a new paper that has yet to be peer-reviewed, the physicists propose that our universe is dominated by tachyons — a hypothetical kind of particle that always moves faster than light. Tachyons almost certainly don't exist; going faster than light violates everything we know about the causal flow of time from past to future. But the hypothetical particles are still interesting to physicists because of the small chance that even our most closely held notions, like causality, might be wrong.

The researchers suggest that tachyons might be the true identity of dark matter, the mysterious form of matter that makes up most of the mass of almost every single galaxy in the universe, outweighing normal matter 5 to 1. Astronomers and physicists alike currently do not know what dark matter is made of, so they are free to cook up all manner of ideas —– because, after all, sometimes a far-out idea is right, and even if it's wrong, it can help us on the path to a better understanding.

The researchers calculate that an expanding universe filled with tachyons can initially slow down in its expansion before reaccelerating. Our universe is currently in an accelerating phase, driven by a phenomenon known as dark energy, so this tachyon cosmological model can potentially explain both dark energy and dark matter at the same time.

Related: There may be a 'dark mirror' universe within ours where atoms failed to form, new study suggests

To test this idea, the physicists applied their model to observations of Type Ia supernovae, a kind of stellar explosion that allows cosmologists to build a relationship between distance and the expansion rate of the universe. It was through Type Ia supernovae that astronomers in the late 1990s first discovered that the universe's expansion rate is accelerating.

A Type Ia supernova seen in the galaxy M82 by the Hubble Space Telescope. These explosions allow astronomers to estimate the expansion rate of the universe. (Image credit: NASA Goddard)

The physicists found that a tachyon cosmological model was just as good at explaining the supernova data as the standard cosmological model involving dark matter and dark energy. That itself is a surprise, given how unorthodox this idea is.

However, that's only the beginning. We now have access to a wealth of data about the large-scale universe, like the cosmic microwave background (remnant radiation released just after the Big Bang) and the arrangement of galaxies at the very largest scales. The next step is to continue testing this idea against those additional observations.

The tachyon cosmological model is unlikely to pass those rigorous experimental tests, given the unlikely nature of tachyons. But continuing to push in new, even unorthodox, directions is important in cosmology; we never know when we might get a breakthrough. Scientists have been attempting to understand dark matter for 50 years and dark energy for a quarter century, without any conclusive results. The solutions to these conundrums are likely to come from unexpected directions.

The team's research was published to the preprint database arXiv in March.

Paul Sutter
Astrophysicist

Paul M. Sutter is a research professor in astrophysics at  SUNY Stony Brook University and the Flatiron Institute in New York City. He regularly appears on TV and podcasts, including  "Ask a Spaceman." He is the author of two books, "Your Place in the Universe" and "How to Die in Space," and is a regular contributor to Space.com, Live Science, and more. Paul received his PhD in Physics from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2011, and spent three years at the Paris Institute of Astrophysics, followed by a research fellowship in Trieste, Italy. 

  • William. walker39
    Could it be possible that the tachyons needed to explain Dark Matter can be explained by Superluminal Nearfield Electromagnetic and or Gravitational fields!

    It is now well known that Gravity and Electromagnetic fields propagate instantaneously in the nearfield and reduce to the speed of light in the farfield, after propagating about 1 wavelength from the source. Both theoretical and experimental evidence is presented and has been confirmed by many independent researchers over the past 20 years. This result is incompatible with Relativity theory and analysis shows that the Special Relativistic effects on time and space are an optical illusion. The same is true for General Relativity since it is based on Special Relativity. It is proposed that Galilean Relativity and Gravitoelectromagnetism theory of gravity are better theories for Relativity and Gravity, where time and space are absolute, and only the present exists. Since Gravitoelectromagnetism assumes gravity is a propagating field, it can be quantized (graviton), enabling the unification of Gravity and Quantum Mechanics. The Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics now becomes the preferred interpretation of Quantum Mechanics because it is completely compatible with Galilean Relativity, and instantaneous propagating fields.

    *YouTube presentation of above argument:
    sePdJ7vSQvQ:0View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sePdJ7vSQvQ&t=0s

    *Paper this presentation is based on:
    William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023
    http://vixra.org/abs/2309.0145
    *New experiment paper: https://www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170862178.82175798/v1
    Dr William Walker, Physicist,
    PhD ETH Zurich 1997
    Reply
  • tcny2023
    Re: Tachyons almost certainly don't exist; going faster than light violates everything we know about the causal flow of time from past to future.

    It's been my amateur understanding that Einstein's theory doesn't forbid faster than light travel, but rather states that objects with mass cannot be accelerated to the speed of light. Because in order to do so it would require an infinite amount of energy since mass moves off towards infinity as an object's speed approaches light speed. But if an object were somehow already moving at light speed it wouldn't be a violation. Am I wrong?
    Reply
  • danr2222
    tcny2023 said:
    Re: Tachyons almost certainly don't exist; going faster than light violates everything we know about the causal flow of time from past to future.

    It's been my amateur understanding that Einstein's theory doesn't forbid faster than light travel, but rather states that objects with mass cannot be accelerated to the speed of light. Because in order to do so it would require an infinite amount of energy since mass moves off towards infinity as an object's speed approaches light speed. But if an object were somehow already moving at light speed it wouldn't be a violation. Am I wrong?
    Non-causality is a feature, not a bug, in this theory. Causality-breaking is offensive to logic/philosophy buffs, but not to (many) theoretical physicists.
    Reply
  • danr2222
    William. walker39 said:
    Could it be possible that the tachyons needed to explain Dark Matter can be explained by Superluminal Nearfield Electromagnetic and or Gravitational fields!
    . . .
    It is now well known that Gravity and Electromagnetic fields propagate instantaneously in the nearfield and reduce to the speed of light in the farfield, after propagating about

    *YouTube presentation of above argument:


    *Paper this presentation is based on:
    William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023
    http://vixra.org/abs/2309.0145
    *New experiment paper: https://www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170862178.82175798/v1
    Dr William Walker, Physicist,
    PhD ETH Zurich 1997
    viXra.lol is the elephants' graveyard where theories that aren't even wrong go to die.
    Reply
  • TheBox
    admin said:
    With the nature of the universe's two most elusive components up for debate, physicists have proposed a radical idea: Invisible particles called tachyons, which break causality and move faster than light, may dominate the cosmos.

    The universe may be dominated by particles that break causality and move faster than light, new paper suggests : Read more
    That can't be true because a particles motion is dependent to its mass-B and an invisible particle in a vacuum space would be transparent not invisible . Therefore because of its transparency , it would have less conservation ability of mass-B and actually be ''heavier'' than light because of it's mass-A .
    Consider atmospheric gaseous mediums such as our atmosphere . The atmospheric particles are transparent , effectively invisible . These particles allow light to pass through but gravitational-B drag forces some of the light to curve around the particles . ( An advanced version of a Rayleigh Scattering) .
    These particles are not great at conserving light (heat) but they are great at obstructing surface light from escaping when it is daytime .
    The reason for this is because of incident thermal current and reflective thermal current creating a ''thermocline'' . Although the term thermocline is associated with water , the atmosphere isn't far dissimilar because it is also a medium .
    Atmosphere rises/expands when there is sufficient light to give it enough mass-B to be affected more by gravity-B than gravity-A . When it exits the lower ''thermocline'' into a higher altitude , the mass-B is lost in space and mass-A regains hold and brings it back down to the lower ''thermocline'' .
    It is possible a transparent particle could gain enough temporal mass-B to escape an atmosphere into space but the temporal conserved mass-B would soon be lost so it would be impossible for it to travel faster than light .
    Additionally the faster a particle travels , the greater the gravitational frame drag .
    Reply
  • tcny2023
    danr2222 said:
    Non-causality is a feature, not a bug, in this theory. Causality-breaking is offensive to logic/philosophy buffs, but not to (many) theoretical physicists.
    Einstein famously referred to instantaneous communication between one-time linked quantum entities (Belle's Theorem, aka EPR Experiment) as "spooky action at a distance". He didn't believe it, since in his view nothing could travel faster than light, although at least some experts in the field don't consider the quantum entities to be actually "communicating".
    Reply
  • WPJLee1983
    danr2222 said:
    Non-causality is a feature, not a bug, in this theory. Causality-breaking is offensive to logic/philosophy buffs, but not to (many) theoretical physicists.
    That's an interesting take on it. The philosophers I hang out with are all aware that causality transcends materiality, and therefore time itself.

    What brought me here was the suggestion that causality could be broken—a fascinating yet ultimately self-negating proposition (the ramblings of David Hume notwithstanding)—but come to find out we're just talking about confusing behaviors of temporo-spatial accidents...not "real" (metaphysical) causality.
    Reply
  • tcny2023
    danr2222 said:
    Non-causality is a feature, not a bug, in this theory. Causality-breaking is offensive to logic/philosophy buffs, but not to (many) theoretical physicists.
    Thanks for the response. However, I'm not sure I understand it, or see how it relates to what I wrote.
    Reply
  • Don Geddis
    You are correct that tachyons, traveling faster than light, are compatible with the equations of Relativity. That isn't the problem.

    The problem is causality. All our experimental data shows that the past controls the future, and the future never influences the past. Violations of causality would be immensely shocking. FTL particles like tachyons imply backwards-in-time causality. The fact that our universe does not seem to have backwards-in-time causality, strongly implies that tachyons don't exist. (It doesn't matter that they are compatible with Relativity equations.)
    Reply