The Malta Independent 23 April 2024, Tuesday
View E-Paper

Tax collection should be prerogative of each EU member state - Alfred Sant

Tuesday, 10 July 2018, 08:19 Last update: about 7 years ago

The European Commission’s proposal on Special VAT Exemption scheme for small enterprises should leave certain simplifications measures optional in case Member States would want to be more stringent in the way they collect their VAT, Maltese MEP Alfred Sant and Shadow Rapporteur for the S&D Group, told the European Parliament Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee (ECON) on the European Commission’s proposal for a Common system of value added tax as regards the special VAT scheme for small enterprises in the framework of the consideration of the amendments from all political groups.  National systems vary in the share of SMEs in their economy and may rely more on VAT collected from them. This is especially relevant in the case of Malta, which derives more tax input from SMEs than other EU countries.

The proposal represents nevertheless an effort to further unblock the rigidities of the VAT with respect to SMEs. Dr Sant underlined that MEPs should each vote for the thresholds that suit the circumstances in their respective countries and that this Directive was not an ideological issue. It should especially ease cross-border traffic for SMEs willing to engage in EU trade.

To this end, Dr Sant expressed his support for the set up of an online registration system and for a one-stop-shop for filing VAT returns in different Member States which would be established by the Commission.

The Maltese MEP emphasised that the simplification measures should be no avenue for tax avoidance and VAT fraud.

“Making the VAT process simpler for SMEs should by no means allow for facilitating abuses or disappearance of tax money.” remarked the Maltese MEP.

Sant said he was totally in favour of keeping the Commission’s threshold of 2 million annual turnover, trusting the Commission’s executive experience. He strongly objected to the Rapporteur's amendment which would increase the threshold in the definition of SMEs up to 4 million euros turnover. Such increase could have great budgetary implications for Malta and could induce a loss of revenues for the national treasury.

I suggest that one sticks to the Commission’s original proposal with only the maximum threshold set for exemption, while Member States would remain with the possibility to set the lower one.

The Maltese MEP referred to an amendment he tabled regarding the transitional regime.

Sant has put forward one of his amendments in favour of SMEs facing seasonal factors or irregular demand, extending the transitional regime foreseen in the Directive.

When SMEs overrun the exemption thresholds of 85,000, they should be provided with a 2 year, rather a 1 year transition period, before losing their exempt status, always provided that the annual turnover in the Member State concerned during these two years, does not exceed the threshold by over 50%. This would allow SMEs in certain sectors, such as the construction sector, which are confronted with seasonal factors and irregular demand, to benefit from a greater smoothing period.

Referring to the implementation dates, the Maltese MEP said that together with the S&D group, he is supporting their advancement, as such VAT simplification measures could be implemented more quickly than the definitive VAT regime.

The report will be voted on Wednesday 11 July in the ECON Committee and will be debated and voted later in September at the Plenary of the European Parliament.

  • don't miss