Evaluation of Patients With a Recent Clinical Fracture and Osteoporosis, a Multidisciplinary Approach

Bianca Dumitrescu; Svenjhalmar van Helden; Rene ten Broeke; Arie Nieuwenhuijzen-Kruseman; Caroline Wyers; Gabriela Udrea; Sjef van der Linden; Piet Geusens

Disclosures

BMC Musculoskelet Disord 

In This Article

Abstract and Background

Abstract

The aetiology of osteoporotic fractures is multifactorial, but little is known about the way to evaluate patients with a recent clinical fracture for the presence of secondary osteoporosis.

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of contributors to secondary osteoporosis in patients presenting with a clinical vertebral or non-vertebral fracture. Identifying and correcting these contributors will enhance treatment effect aimed at reducing the risk of subsequent fractures.

In a multidisciplinary approach, including evaluation of bone and fall-related risk factors, 100 consecutive women (n = 73) and men (n = 27) older than 50 years presenting with a clinical vertebral or non-vertebral fracture and having osteoporosis (T-score ≤-2.5) were further evaluated clinically and by laboratory testing for the presence of contributors to secondary osteoporosis.

In 27 patients, 34 contributors were previously known, in 50 patients 52 new contributors were diagnosed (mainly vitamin D deficiency in 42) and 14 needed further exploration because of laboratory abnormalities (mainly abnormal thyroid stimulating hormone in 9). The 57 patients with contributors were older (71 vs. 64 yrs, p < 0.01), had more vertebral deformities (67% vs. 44%, p < 0.05) and a higher calculated absolute 10-year risk for major (16.5 vs. 9.9%, p < 0.01) and for hip fracture (6.9 vs. 2.4%, p < 0.01) than patients without contributors. The presence of contributors was similar between women and men and between patients with fractures associated with a low or high-energy trauma.

We conclude that more than one in two patients presenting with a clinical vertebral or non-vertebral fracture and BMD-osteoporosis have secondary contributors to osteoporosis, most of which were correctable. Identifying and correcting these associated disorders will enhance treatment effect aimed at reducing the risk of subsequent fractures in patients older than 50 years.

Background

Clinical vertebral and non-vertebral fractures are the most frequent fractures in patients presenting to the emergency ward of the hospital with a fracture.[1] After such fracture, patients are at increased risk for subsequent fracture and guidelines on osteoporosis advocate to evaluate patients presenting with a fracture in order to consider treament to reduce the risk of subsequent fractures.[2]

One aspect of care identified within the management of fracture patients is the existence of contributors to secondary causes of bone loss.[3] Effective therapy requires that these contributors be recognised and when present managed appropriately.[3,4] If these conditions, however, are not recognized, treatment may be suboptimal or ineffective.[5,6]

Apart from bone mineral density (BMD)-osteoporosis (T-score less than or equal to -2.5)[4,7,8] many risk factors are related to fracture risk, independently of BMD, such as clinical risk factors,[9] fall risks,[10] prevalent morphometric vertebral fractures (MVF)[11] and secondary osteoporosis.[12] There is increasing evidence that secondary osteoporosis is more prevalent than initially thought, not only in males, but also in females,[13] but the true prevalence of contributors to secondary osteoporosis is unknown and no consensus regarding its evaluation is available.[14]

Published data from referral centres for evaluation of osteoporosis indicate that 32 to 37% of women with low BMD have a history of other diseases or medications known to contribute to osteoporosis.[3,15] From 20% up to 64% of patients had previously unknown secondary causes of osteoporosis that were only identified by laboratory testing.[5] In a study of patients with a clinical fracture, a high prevalence of contributors to secondary osteoporosis (77%) was reported, but the study included only a limited number of patients with measured low BMD.[16] In a study of patients with a hip fracture, 80% had secondary causes of bone loss, mainly related to disturbed calcium and vitamin D homeostasis.[6] To date, we lack studies on the prevalence of contributors to secondary osteoporosis in other fracture populations.

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of contributors to secondary osteoporosis, in the context of other bone- and fall-related fracture risks in patients presenting with a clinical vertebral or non-vertebral fracture and with a low BMD. Identifying and correcting contributors will enhance treatment effect aimed at reducing the risk of subsequent fractures.

Comments

3090D553-9492-4563-8681-AD288FA52ACE
Comments on Medscape are moderated and should be professional in tone and on topic. You must declare any conflicts of interest related to your comments and responses. Please see our Commenting Guide for further information. We reserve the right to remove posts at our sole discretion.

processing....