Leonid Bershidsky, Columnist

Slovakia Shows That Hate Speech Is Bad, Banning It Is Worse

Three months before an election, the leader of Slovakia’s most popular party has been charged with inciting ethnic hatred.

Not the real Robert Fico.

Photographer: Vladimir Simicek/AFP/Getty Images

Lock
This article is for subscribers only.

Three months before Slovakia’s national election, Robert Fico, the nation’s former three-term prime minister and current leader of the ruling party, has been charged with hate speech, an offense that can potentially land him in prison for five years. Though what he said is certainly reprehensible, the case shows why censoring political speech, as many European countries routinely do, isn’t a great idea.

The story began in October 2016, when Milan Mazurek, a nationalist member of the Slovak parliament, said in a radio interview that the government shouldn’t be funding housing for the country’s Roma minority — “people who have never done anything for our nation or our state, but on the contrary, chose to live in an asocial way and suck on our social system.” Both Mazurek and the radio station later were fined, and the legislator lost his parliamentary mandate. Slovakia’s Supreme Court made the final decision in the case in September 2019.