A Curious Case of Anti-D Antibody Titer

Jennifer G. Hensley, CNM, WHNP, EdD; Katherine P. Coughlin, CNM, MSN; Laura L. Klein, MD

Disclosures

J Midwifery Womens Health. 2009;54(6):497-502. 

In This Article

Laboratory Testing

There is no laboratory test to distinguish between active (alloimmunization) or passive anti-D antibody (RhIG administration) production. One or the other is assumed by the strength of RBC reaction to agglutinins that test for anti-D antibody.[1] A titer from passive RhIG administration may reach 1:4; a titer ≥ 1:8 requires further investigation for RhD alloimmunization.[1] Measurement of the amount of anti-D antibody in the plasma is variable between and within laboratories. Variability in performing and reporting a titer result is caused by differences in available reagents, shelf life of the reagents, equipment used, and operator competence. For these reasons, 1) the same laboratory should be used to run the titers, and 2) a four-fold increase, or 2-tube dilutional change, becomes necessary to qualify as a true increase in the amount of antibody production that corresponds with a risk of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. For example, a titer increase from 1:8 to 1:16 is not significant, but an increase from 1:8 to 1:32 is significant.[1] Each laboratory sets its own "critical" titer for anti-D antibody that requires follow-up; this is the titer at which fetal hydrops is likely to occur.[1] The critical titer could be 1:8, 1:16, or 1:32. The clinician will need to know the critical titer at their laboratory to effectively interpret high titer results.

Comments

3090D553-9492-4563-8681-AD288FA52ACE
Comments on Medscape are moderated and should be professional in tone and on topic. You must declare any conflicts of interest related to your comments and responses. Please see our Commenting Guide for further information. We reserve the right to remove posts at our sole discretion.

processing....