Climate change: Fossil fuel industry's plans for carbon-capture-and-storage are an expensive distraction – Dr Richard Dixon

Cognitive dissonance is very much in evidence in many countries’ attitudes to climate change and fossil fuels.

Both the Scottish Government and the UK Government claim to be among the world leaders on climate change and that is truish for the UK and true for Scotland (although everyone needs to do much more). Yet both governments are still firmly committed to a policy which locks into law a duty to extract every last drop of oil and gas possible. Some countries have realised that when you are in a hole, the first thing to do is stop digging. Or as Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg says, if you’re house is on fire, don’t pour on petrol.

Belize, Denmark, France, Ireland, New Zealand, Wales and some US states have all stopped issuing new licences for oil and gas developments. Italy has a temporary ban in place. Of course, we need to phase out fossil fuels completely, and soon, in a planned and organised just transition, but stopping looking for more is an excellent first step.

Meanwhile in the UK, we will very soon see the results of the 32nd round of licensing for offshore oil and gas – new sites which could still be producing fossil fuels into the 2050s. There was even more interest than the last round, with more than 100 applications made, covering the 245 North Sea sites on offer. There are still plans for a 33rd round of new licences although they are delayed because of coronavirus.

A good campaigning ploy would seem to be for us at Friends of the Earth Scotland to bid for all the blocks and then not develop any we won. However, supposedly, you have to prove you are a credible applicant capable of developing the site and we don’t seem to have any petro-geologists on the staff of FoE or own any oil rigs.

The thing about cognitive dissonance is that it is hard to live with and so sufferers will grasp at any straw which might seemingly reconcile the glaring contradiction in their world view.

This is exactly what is happening with the oil industry. Everyone who wants to maintain the fiction that you can extract as much fossil fuels as you like and still claim you are serious about climate change is delighted to enthusiastically embrace carbon-capture-and-storage as the answer. This is an eye-wateringly expensive technology that might take most (but not all) of the carbon out of fossil fuels if you actually got it working on a massive scale.

The result of this prize being dangled by the oil industry is that both the UK and Scottish Governments are throwing money at the carbon-capture dream. One of the first economic recovery packages from the Scottish Government supports CCS and related industries. The UK Government put in funding last year and it is widely expected there will be lots more in the economic recovery funding announced by the Chancellor next month.

As an answer to climate emissions, carbon capture is much too slow and much too expensive. The same money spent on energy efficiency and renewable energy would create more jobs, reduce emissions permanently to zero and improve people’s lives by making their homes more liveable.

Our recovery from the virus needs to be one which sets us on the right, fair track on energy and climate.

Dr Richard Dixon is director of Friends of the Earth Scotland

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this article on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.

With the coronavirus lockdown having a major impact on many of our advertisers - and consequently the revenue we receive - we are more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription.

Subscribe to scotsman.com and enjoy unlimited access to Scottish news and information online and on our app. With a digital subscription, you can read more than 5 articles, see fewer ads, enjoy faster load times, and get access to exclusive newsletters and content. Visit www.scotsman.com/subscriptions now to sign up.

Our journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them. By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.

Joy Yates

Editorial Director