New York Senate 2004 Race
- New York Senate
- New York District 01
- New York District 02
- New York District 03
- New York District 04
- New York District 05
- New York District 06
- New York District 07
- New York District 08
- New York District 09
- New York District 10
- New York District 11
- New York District 12
- New York District 13
- New York District 14
- New York District 15
- New York District 16
- New York District 17
- New York District 18
- New York District 19
- New York District 20
- New York District 21
- New York District 22
- New York District 23
- New York District 24
- New York District 25
- New York District 26
- New York District 27
- New York District 28
- New York District 29
Geography Data
In State Contributions vs. Out of State Contributions
| Candidate | In State | Out of State | No State Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charles E Schumer (D) | $15,667,808 (71.0%) | $6,386,255 (29.0%) | $135,750 (0.2%) |
| Howard Mills (R) | $356,310 (95.9%) | $15,350 (4.1%) | $3,050 (0.3%) |
| Marilyn F O'Grady (3) | $29,550 (82.4%) | $6,300 (17.6%) | $0 |
| Donald Silberger (L) | $950 (32.2%) | $2,000 (67.8%) | $0 |
| David E McReynolds (3) | $2,350 (100.0%) | $0 | $0 |
HOW TO READ THIS TABLE: Candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives typically get the majority of their campaign dollars from donors within their home state. + Read more
Senate candidates show a variety of patterns, depending on the size of the state and the wealth of its economic base. Candidates in states like New York, California and Texas may get most of their money from their constituents, while those in the most sparsely populated states may get nearly all their money from out of state.
As a general rule, incumbents get more out-of-state money than challengers, a reflection of their status as members of Congress and the wider circles in which they travel. Challengers and newcomers are rarely well known outside their state, so their ability to raise funds beyond their district is more limited.
"No State Data" means that there was no state listed on contribution report.
METHODOLOGY: The numbers on this page are calculated from contributions from individuals, as reported to the Federal Election Commission. PAC dollars are not included.
Top Metro Areas
Charles E Schumer (D)
| Metro Area | Total |
|---|---|
| NEW YORK | $11,396,156 |
| NASSAU-SUFFOLK | $2,988,367 |
| BRIDGEPORT | $937,449 |
| NEWARK | $699,270 |
| BERGEN-PASSAIC | $544,140 |
Howard Mills (R)
| Metro Area | Total |
|---|---|
| NEW YORK | $133,114 |
| NEWBURGH, NY-PA | $58,940 |
| ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY | $37,694 |
| NASSAU-SUFFOLK | $29,500 |
| ROCHESTER | $17,800 |
Marilyn F O'Grady (3)
| Metro Area | Total |
|---|---|
| NASSAU-SUFFOLK | $20,250 |
| NEW YORK | $8,550 |
| BOSTON, MA-NH | $2,300 |
| NEW HAVEN-MERIDEN | $2,000 |
| PHILADELPHIA, PA-NJ | $1,250 |
David E McReynolds (3)
| Metro Area | Total |
|---|---|
| NEW YORK | $2,100 |
| NASSAU-SUFFOLK | $250 |
Donald Silberger (L)
| Metro Area | Total |
|---|---|
| BRIDGEPORT | $2,000 |
| ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY | $450 |
HOW TO READ METRO AREA TABLES: The search for campaign cash makes "dialing for dollars" one of the most time-intensive parts of any political campaign. Where do all those well-heeled donors live? For most candidates, the richest source of large individual contributions will be the most populous metro areas within their state or district. Many incumbents also draw significant sums from the nation's capital. Senators and other high-profile incumbents may draw from the Big Three sources of campaign cash nationally: New York City, Washington, DC and Los Angeles.
Top Zip Codes
Charles E Schumer (D)
| Zip Code | Total |
|---|---|
| 10021 (New York, NY) | $1,784,985 |
| 10022 (New York, NY) | $768,603 |
| 10028 (New York, NY) | $731,850 |
| 10128 (New York, NY) | $724,846 |
| 10023 (New York, NY) | $519,599 |
| 10024 (New York, NY) | $511,150 |
| 10583 (Scarsdale, NY) | $388,350 |
| 10019 (New York, NY) | $372,272 |
| 10017 (New York, NY) | $311,034 |
| 10016 (New York, NY) | $192,663 |
Howard Mills (R)
| Zip Code | Total |
|---|---|
| 10021 (New York, NY) | $18,800 |
| 10017 (New York, NY) | $15,034 |
| 10990 (Warwick, NY) | $13,500 |
| 10941 (Middletown, NY) | $9,100 |
| 10924 (Goshen, NY) | $8,750 |
| 10028 (New York, NY) | $8,500 |
| 10022 (New York, NY) | $8,000 |
| 10024 (New York, NY) | $8,000 |
| 12148 (Rexford, NY) | $8,000 |
| 12993 (WESTPORT, NY) | $8,000 |
Marilyn F O'Grady (3)
| Zip Code | Total |
|---|---|
| 11530 (Garden City, NY) | $9,250 |
| 11570 (Rockville Centre, NY) | $3,000 |
| 10021 (New York, NY) | $2,500 |
| 02110 (Boston, MA) | $2,000 |
| 06511 (New Haven, CT) | $2,000 |
| 10533 (Irvington, NY) | $2,000 |
| 11040 (New Hyde Park, NY) | $2,000 |
| 11001 (Floral Park, NY) | $1,000 |
| 11050 (Port Washington, NY) | $1,000 |
| 10128 (New York, NY) | $750 |
| 11209 (Brooklyn, NY) | $750 |
David E McReynolds (3)
| Zip Code | Total |
|---|---|
| 10007 (New York, NY) | $1,000 |
| 10512 (Carmel, NY) | $300 |
| 11215 (Brooklyn, NY) | $300 |
| 10021 (New York, NY) | $250 |
| 10022 (New York, NY) | $250 |
| 11756 (Levittown, NY) | $250 |
Donald Silberger (L)
| Zip Code | Total |
|---|---|
| 06883 (Weston, CT) | $2,000 |
| 12740 (GRAHAMSVILLE, NY) | $500 |
| 12054 (Delmar, NY) | $250 |
| 12065 (Clifton Park, NY) | $200 |
HOW TO READ ZIP CODE TABLES: The search for campaign cash makes "dialing for dollars" one of the most time-intensive parts of any political campaign. Where do all those well-heeled donors live? For most candidates, the richest source of large individual contributions will be the most populous metro areas within their state or district. Many incumbents also draw significant sums from the nation's capital. Senators and other high-profile incumbents may draw from the Big Three sources of campaign cash nationally: New York City, Washington, DC and Los Angeles.
We do not have data for the following candidates:
- Abraham Hirschfeld (I)
- Martin Koppel (3)
METHODOLOGY: The numbers on this page are calculated from contributions from individuals, as reported to the Federal Election Commission. PAC dollars are not included.
NOTE: All the numbers on this page are for the 1999-2004 Senate election cycle and based on Federal Election Commission data available electronically on September 15, 2013. ("Help! The numbers don't add up...")
WHY DON'T THE NUMBERS ADD UP?
Sometimes it's hard to make apple-to-apple comparisons across some of the pages in a candidate's profile. Here's why:
Summary numbers - specifically "Total Raised and Spent" and "PAC/Individual Split" - are based on summary reports filed by the candidates with the Federal Election Commission. All other numbers in these profiles ("Quality of Disclosure," "Geography" and "Special Interests") are derived from detailed FEC reports that itemize all contributions of $200 or more.
There is also a time lag in posting the information. While summary numbers are reported almost immediately by the FEC -- and listed quickly on OpenSecrets -- processing and analyzing the detailed records takes much longer. For that reason, summary numbers are usually higher (and more current) than the numbers based on detailed records.
HOW CURRENT ARE THESE FIGURES?
The figures in these profiles are taken from databases uploaded by the FEC to the internet on the first day of every month. Those databases are only as current as the FEC has been able to compile by that date (see the note above about lag times for data entry).
OpenSecrets updates figures for "Total Raised and Spent" and for "PAC/Individual Split" a few days after the first of the month. The remaining figures - based on detailed contribution data - is updated by OpenSecrets after the 20th of every month. This gives us time to analyze the contributions and categorize them by industry and interest group.
Feel free to distribute or cite this material, but please credit OpenSecrets. For permission to reprint for commercial uses, such as textbooks, contact OpenSecrets: [email protected]