Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Law: Identity Theft-Substantively Unreasonable Sentence-Mootness

Staff Report//November 13, 2018//

Criminal Law: Identity Theft-Substantively Unreasonable Sentence-Mootness

Staff Report//November 13, 2018//

Listen to this article

Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to identity theft and was sentenced to 30 months’ imprisonment; the district court did not impose a term of supervised release. On appeal, defendant asserted procedural error and substantive unreasonableness.

Where defendant had been discharged from prison and was not under further supervision. appeal challenging sentence was moot.

Appeal dismissed as moot.

U.S. v. Gonzalez-Abreu (MLW No. 72271/Case No. 16-4568 – 2 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, per curiam) Appealed from U.S. District Court, District of South Dakota

Latest Opinion Digests

See all digests

Top stories

See more news