Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Clinical Research

Diagnostic performance of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in biochemically relapsed patients with prostate cancer with PSA levels ≤ 2.0 ng/ml

Abstract

Background

The aim of the study was to prospectively evaluate diagnostic performance of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) after radical treatment and low but rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 40 consecutive patients after radical treatment (80%—radical prostatectomy, 20%—radiation beam therapy) of PCa and low (0.008 to ≤2.0 ng/ml), rising PSA. Skull to mid-thigh PET/CT imaging was performed 95 (±12) min after injection of 295.5 (±14.1) MBq 18F-PSMA-1007. Detection rate was correlated with PSA levels, Gleason score (GS) and T stage ≥ 3. PET/CT results were verified during 10.3 (±4.7) months follow-up to calculate sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive values (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV).

Results

18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT was positive in 24/40 patients, which yielded overall detection rate of 60%. Detection rate was 39%, 55% and 100% for PSA < 0.5, 0.5 to <1.0 and 1.0 to ≤2.0 ng/ml, respectively. PET/CT showed metastases in locoregional lymph nodes in 55% of patients, bones in 36% of patients and local recurrence in 9% of patients. Detection rate was correlated with PSA—a 0.1 ng/ml rise in PSA level increased odds for positive PET/CT by ~30%. PET/CT positivity was independent of GS and T stage. Verification of 40 lesions yielded sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 100%, 94.4%, 66.7% and 100%, respectively.

Conclusions

18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT shows relatively high detection rate in patients with PCa after radical treatment and low, rising PSA levels. Like other PSMA-targeting radiotracers, its detection rate is dependent on PSA levels. 18F-PSMA-1007 also presents excellent sensitivity, specificity and NPV.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cornford P, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, De Santis M, Gross T, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2017;71:630–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stish BJ, Pisansky TM, Harmsen WS, Davis BJ, Tzou KS, Choo R, et al. Improved metastasis-free and survival outcomes with early salvage radiotherapy in men with detectable prostate-specific antigen after prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2016;34:3864–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Siegmann A, Bottke D, Faehndrich J, Brachert M, Lohm G, Miller K, et al. Salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy—what is the best time to treat? Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radio Oncol. 2012;103:239–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wiegel T, Lohm G, Bottke D, Höcht S, Miller K, Siegmann A, et al. Achieving an undetectable PSA after radiotherapy for biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of biochemical outcome–results of a retrospective study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73:1009–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cardinale J, Schäfer M, Benešová M, Bauder-Wüst U, Leotta K, Eder M, et al. Preclinical evaluation of 18F-PSMA-1007, a new prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand for prostate cancer imaging. J Nucl Med Publ Soc Nucl Med. 2017;58:425–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Giesel FL, Knorr K, Spohn F, Will L, Maurer T, Flechsig P, et al. Detection efficacy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med Publ Soc Nucl Med. 2019;60:362–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rahbar K, Afshar-Oromieh A, Seifert R, Wagner S, Schäfers M, Bögemann M, et al. Diagnostic performance of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:2055–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rahbar K, Afshar-Oromieh A, Bögemann M, Wagner S, Schäfers M, Stegger L, et al. 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT at 60 and 120 min in patients with prostate cancer: biodistribution, tumour detection and activity kinetics. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:1329–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Robu S, Schmidt A, Eiber M, Schottelius M, Günther T, Hooshyar Yousefi B, et al. Synthesis and preclinical evaluation of novel 18F-labeled Glu-urea-Glu-based PSMA inhibitors for prostate cancer imaging: a comparison with 18F-DCFPyl and 18F-PSMA-1007. EJNMMI Res. 2018;8:30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Afshar-Oromieh A, Avtzi E, Giesel FL, Holland-Letz T, Linhart HG, Eder M, et al. The diagnostic value of PET/CT imaging with the (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand HBED-CC in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:197–209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Eiber M, Maurer T, Souvatzoglou M, Beer AJ, Ruffani A, Haller B, et al. Evaluation of hybrid 68Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT in 248 patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med Publ Soc Nucl Med. 2015;56:668–74.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rowe SP, Campbell SP, Mana-Ay M, Szabo Z, Allaf ME, Pienta KJ, et al. Prospective evaluation of PSMA-targeted 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in men with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. 2019.

  13. Detti B, Scoccianti S, Franceschini D, Cipressi S, Cassani S, Villari D, et al. Predictive factors of [18F]-Choline PET/CT in 170 patients with increasing PSA after primary radical treatment. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013;139:521–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hope TA, Goodman JZ, Allen IE, Calais J, Fendler WP, Carroll PR. Metaanalysis of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy for the detection of prostate cancer validated by histopathology. J Nucl Med Publ Soc Nucl Med. 2019;60:786–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dyrberg E, Hendel HW, Huynh THV, Klausen TW, Løgager VB, Madsen C, et al. 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in comparison with 18F-fluoride-PET/CT and whole-body MRI for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:1221–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamed MAG, Basha MAA, Ahmed H, Obaya AA, Afifi AHM, Abdelbary EH. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with rising prostatic-specific antigen after definitive treatment of prostate cancer: detection efficacy and diagnostic accuracy. Acad Radiol. 2019;26:450–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ewa Witkowska-Patena.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Witkowska-Patena, E., Giżewska, A., Dziuk, M. et al. Diagnostic performance of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in biochemically relapsed patients with prostate cancer with PSA levels ≤ 2.0 ng/ml. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 23, 343–348 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-019-0194-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-019-0194-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links