Skip to content
NOWCAST KCCI News at 10pm Weeknights
Watch on Demand
Advertisement

Federal court dismisses case against Reynolds' ban on school mask mandates

Federal court dismisses case against Reynolds' ban on school mask mandates
NOW THE BATTLE OVER I WAS LAW BANNING MASS MANDATES IN SCHOOL DEMA IT TO THE FEDERAL COURT THIS MORNING LAWYERS FOR GOVERNOR KIM REYNOLD S.INTO APPEAL A JUDGE’S RULING THAT ALLOWS SCHOOLS TO ISSUE MASS MANDATES DURING THE PANDEMIC NEW AT NOON. KCCI’S AMANDA ROOKER BRINGS US THE ARGUMTS FROM BOTH SIDES AMANDA. THE APPEAL WAS HEARD THIS MORNING. IN THE EIGHTH CCUIRIT COURTN I OMAHA. THE STATE IS FIGHTING TO KEEP IOWA’S LAW BANNING MASKS MANDATES IN SCHOOLS. IT’S A LAW THAT’S BEEN PUT ON HOLD UNTIL THE COURTS MAKE THEIR DECIONSI THIS MORNING IN COURT. THE STATE’S COUNCIL ARGUED THAT THE INJUNCTION BLOCKING IOWA’S WLA IS QUOTE OVERBROAD AND ATTEMPT TO OVERPOWER STATE AUTHORITY. HE SSAY THE STATE IS QUOTE NOT CONTENDING THAT ABSOLUTELY NO MASS SHOULD EXISTND A THATHE T LAW DOES ALLOW FOR EXCEPTIONS WHEN MASKS ARE NEEDED BUTN OTHE OTHER SIDE PLAINTIFFS SAY I WAS LAW VIOLATES THE AMERICANS WITH THIS ABILITIES ACT ARC OF IOWA AND THE ACLU ARGUED THAT THE ST ATE NEE TODS TAILOR THEIR POLICY TO ALLOW STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES TO GO TO SCHOOL WITHOUT RISK TO THEIR HEALTH AND WELL-BEING. THEIR COUNCIL SAYSS A IT STANDS THE IOWA LAW DOESN’T ALLOW FOR SCHOOL. TO REQUIRE MASKS ON A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS WITHOUT FEARING THAT THEY’LL LOSE THEIR ACCREDITATION. NOW THAT BHOT SIDES HAVE BEEN HEARD THREE FEDERAL JUDGES ARE DELIBERATING. KCCI WILL BRING YOU THEIR DECISION AS SOON AS IT COMES DOWN. THANK YOU, AMANDA. WELL THE LEGAL BATTLE OVER MASS MANDATES STARTED NOT LONG AFTER THE IOWA LEGISLATOR PASDSE BAN EARLY THIS YEAR CASES BOBO MAN SHOWS US HOW THAT LAW ENDED UP IN CRTOU TODAY. WELL, TC A GOVERNOR REYNOLDS ORIGINALLY SIGNED THISAN B ON SKMA MANDATES BACK IN MAY IT WASN’T UNTIL SEPTEMBER THE START OFHE T SCHOOL YREA THAT THE LAWSUIT WAS FILED AND A TEMPORARY INJUNCTION WASUT P INTO PCELA WE HEARD FROM PARENTS FROM ALL OVER THE STATE AT SCOLHO BOARD MEETINGS PASSIONATELY DEFENDING THEIR STANCE ON WHY SCHOOLS SHOULDR O SHOULDN’T GO BACK TO MANDATING MASK THE ISSUE FOUND ITSELF AT TH CEENTER OF MANY NONPARTISAN SCHOOL BOARD RACES IN SOME DISTRICTS LIKEAU WKEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEES WERE FORMED. CAMPAIGN ON BEHALF OF ANTI-MASK CANDIDATES GOVERNOR REYNOLDS SENT US A STATEMENT IN OCT ARE SAYING IN PART QUOTE WE WILL NEVER STOP FIGHTING FOR THE RIGHTS OF PARENTS TO DECIDE WHAT IS BEST FOR THEIR CHILDREN AND TO UPHOLD STATE LAWS ENACTED. BY OUR ELECTED LEGISLATURE LEGISLATORS, THE PLAINTIFF’S ARK OF IOWA AND THE ACLU SAY THE LAW VIOLATES THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. IT’S A CRUALCI RULGIN BECAUSE IT PROTECTS THE KIDS WITH WHO ARE IMMUNO COMPROMISED OR WITH DISABILITY SO THAT THEY CAN BE PROTECTED IN SCHOOLND A IT PROVIDES FOR UNIVERSAL MASKING FOR SCHOOL DISTRICTS THAT EMPLOY IT AND THAT’S A TO PROTECT KIDS. ATTORNEY AND DRAKE ASSOCIATE LAW PROFESSOR DENISE HILL SAYS THE JUDGE PUT THE INJUNCTION IN BASED ON HIS FINDINGS CITING THE INCREASE IN PEDIATRIC COVID-19 CASES IN IOWA THE GRAVE HARM THAT CHILDREN INVOLVED IN THE CASE COULD F
Advertisement
Federal court dismisses case against Reynolds' ban on school mask mandates
A federal court on Tuesday dismissed a legal challenge to Gov. Kim Reynolds' policy prohibiting schools from instituting mask requirements, which was brought by families of students with disabilities during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.Video above: Battle over mask mandates in Iowa goes to courtThe ruling marks the conclusion of the yearslong court battle, originating in the fall of 2021 with a lawsuit alleging that Reynolds violated federal disability law by preventing schools from adopting mask mandates as an accommodation for students with disabilities.Reynolds celebrated the result, saying in a statement that Iowa focused on keeping kids in the classroom, "trusting parents to decide what was best for their children.""While children were the least vulnerable, they paid the highest price for COVID lockdowns and mandates, but Iowa was a different story," she said.The American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa and Disability Rights Iowa, among others, filed the lawsuit on behalf of The Arc of Iowa, a disability advocacy organization, and Iowa families, citing the heightened risk to students with disabilities.Rita Bettis Austen, ACLU of Iowa's legal director, said in a statement they were disappointed by the ruling but "proud of what this case was able to accomplish for vulnerable children in Iowa," saying the case provided "early relief for our clients."The law was partially blocked for schools with students with disabilities for most of the 2021-2022 school year."Masking was critical to protecting the ability of children with underlying conditions and disabilities to attend school in person," she said in an email. "Even in dismissing the case, the Court confirmed that Iowa law 'does not prohibit a school from complying with disability laws.'"A federal judge ruled in November 2022 that a school must consider, like any other accommodation request, a disabled students' request that teachers, aides, students or others interacting with them wear a mask. The judge also said that a mandate must be allowed if that school district, considering Reynolds' ban on mask mandates among other factors, determines it the request is a reasonable modification to make.Reynolds appealed, and the federal court's ruling orders dismissal, saying those who brought the lawsuit didn't have standing to sue the state over the law. While COVID-19 remains an "ever-present concern in society," the court said, the general risks "are not enough to show 'imminent and substantial' harm for standing" since they are speculative.The court also dismissed the claims saying they did not clearly establish a connection between Reynolds' action – the law or its enforcement – and the alleged injury of enduring COVID-19 and its risks.» Download the free KCCI app to get updates on the go: Apple | Google PlayGet the latest headlines from KCCI

A federal court on Tuesday dismissed a legal challenge to Gov. Kim Reynolds' policy prohibiting schools from instituting mask requirements, which was brought by families of students with disabilities during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Video above: Battle over mask mandates in Iowa goes to court

Advertisement

The ruling marks the conclusion of the yearslong court battle, originating in the fall of 2021 with a lawsuit alleging that Reynolds violated federal disability law by preventing schools from adopting mask mandates as an accommodation for students with disabilities.

Reynolds celebrated the result, saying in a statement that Iowa focused on keeping kids in the classroom, "trusting parents to decide what was best for their children."

"While children were the least vulnerable, they paid the highest price for COVID lockdowns and mandates, but Iowa was a different story," she said.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa and Disability Rights Iowa, among others, filed the lawsuit on behalf of The Arc of Iowa, a disability advocacy organization, and Iowa families, citing the heightened risk to students with disabilities.

Rita Bettis Austen, ACLU of Iowa's legal director, said in a statement they were disappointed by the ruling but "proud of what this case was able to accomplish for vulnerable children in Iowa," saying the case provided "early relief for our clients."

The law was partially blocked for schools with students with disabilities for most of the 2021-2022 school year.

"Masking was critical to protecting the ability of children with underlying conditions and disabilities to attend school in person," she said in an email. "Even in dismissing the case, the Court confirmed that Iowa law 'does not prohibit a school from complying with disability laws.'"

A federal judge ruled in November 2022 that a school must consider, like any other accommodation request, a disabled students' request that teachers, aides, students or others interacting with them wear a mask. The judge also said that a mandate must be allowed if that school district, considering Reynolds' ban on mask mandates among other factors, determines it the request is a reasonable modification to make.

Reynolds appealed, and the federal court's ruling orders dismissal, saying those who brought the lawsuit didn't have standing to sue the state over the law. While COVID-19 remains an "ever-present concern in society," the court said, the general risks "are not enough to show 'imminent and substantial' harm for standing" since they are speculative.

The court also dismissed the claims saying they did not clearly establish a connection between Reynolds' action – the law or its enforcement – and the alleged injury of enduring COVID-19 and its risks.

» Download the free KCCI app to get updates on the go: Apple | Google Play

Get the latest headlines from KCCI