THOUSANDS of healthy American schoolboys are being dosed on a controversial drug said to improve their performance.
An estimated one in 10 boys aged nine to 13 were being given Ritolin - normally used in the treatment of hyperactivity - so that they would perform better at school or relate better to their parents, said Professor Stephen Rose, director of the Brain and Behaviour Research group at the Open University.
Professor Rose said that ``steroids for the mind'' - smart drugs which would improve cognitive performance in the general population - could be available within the next decade. They will be around initially for the alleviation of conditions like Alzheimer's,'' he said.
``But can we envisage there use spreading until they become as commonly used as steroids for body-builders amd athletes? And if so, what are the ethical, legal, and social consequences?''
Professor Rose said he was concerned at the increasing tendency to blame complex social phenomena - violence and crime in the streets, drug addiction, homelessness - on disordered brains resulting from disordered genes.
``While no one goes so far as to blame violence in Bosnia, Chechnyia, or Rwanda and Burundi on genes responsible for aggression and xenophobia, or suggest its treatment by mass prescription of Prozac, some of the proposals, particularly from the US, tip strongly in that direction.''
But he was less worried about Prozac than the mass dosing of young people with Ritolin.
``Trying to identify biochemical factors in young children leading to antisocial temperament does nothing to address the real causes of the US homicide rate - extremes of poverty and the existence of 280 million handguns said to be in circulation,'' he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article