The city of Ketchum’s portion of the bill for its Main Street redesign project will cost an additional $250,000, city officials have determined.
The cost estimate arrived during a Monday, April 15, council meeting during which council members deliberated over whether to authorize Ketchum Mayor Neil Bradshaw to sign an agreement for the project with contractor Idaho Materials & Construction. The city received no Main Street reconstruction bids by March 21, the original deadline for contractors to respond to the city’s call for project proposals, the Express previously reported. Under Idaho law, the city was then allowed to negotiate directly with potential contractors, leading city staff members to develop and present Monday’s deal to the council.
On Monday, city staff presented two choices for the council to select. The first would have raised Ketchum’s cost of the project by close to $700,000, while the second—which was selected—raised it by $250,000. Numerous modifications will be made to the timeline as well as which part of the work will be completed this year.
Following word that certain parts of the project will substantially raise the cost of construction, the total estimated cost of the project is $9.5 million. The funding will be largely covered by the Idaho Transportation Department—the state agency will pay $7 million, while the city will pay about $1.25 million, which includes the additional $250,000. A contribution from the Ketchum Urban Renewal Agency will also be around $1.25 million.
Redoing the Second Street ramp and sidewalk by the Sun Valley Culinary Institute will be pushed to 2025, as will work on the Fifth Street sidewalk. In 2027, a new multiuse path from Sixth Street to the cemetery will be constructed as part of improvements in the northern section of town.
Bus stop amenities like reader boards and bench covers will also be pushed down the road to a date yet to be determined, as will art and history pieces, like signs to direct tourists around town, and possible sidewalk paintings.
Under the plans set to commence this year, ADA ramps along the corridor will be switched from pavers to concrete to save costs. Silva cells—special pavers used to allow tree growth—will be reduced in size for the same reason. Street furnishings will be pushed down the road, too.
Improvements to the Hot Dog Hill sidewalks will be completed by the developer instead. Reconstruction of the sidewalk around Serva Restaurant will be paid for by the city, but Ketchum officials will seek reimbursement for the tasks, said City Public Engagement Manager Daniel Hansen in an interview. The city will purchase trees directly from a tree vendor to save money.
“This is a larger ask than we first set out with, but it also keeps to our goal of good bones for Main Street,” Mayor Neil Bradshaw said. “Let’s make something we’re proud of and not cut costs where we have to cut into the design.”
The additional funds exist within the city’s accounts to pay for the increase, Hansen said.
Councilmen Tripp Hutchinson and Spencer Cordovano on Monday expressed reservations about plans to install left-turn lanes at the intersection of Main Street and Sun Valley Road. Their opposition led to a split vote, prompting Bradshaw to cast the deciding vote. He voted in favor of the current plans and proposed budget increase.
Bradshaw said proposals from the two junior council members to eliminate the left-turn lanes in favor of maintaining parking on Main Street or an increased “road diet”—a term for decreasing the vehicular environment to lower speed in favor of increased pedestrian amenities—are “off the table.” Cordovano and Hutchinson did not readily accept that answer.
“I’d like to hear the Idaho Transportation Department say it’s off the table,” Cordovano said.
“The perspective that I am taking on this is that no decision is [final] until ground has been broken,” Hutchinson said.
He added that he thought the genesis of this whole project was insistence from former Councilman Michael David that the Main Street corridor needs to better accommodate pedestrians.
Councilwoman Amanda Breen disagreed.
“The origin of the project was that the road needed rebuilding and ITD had a certain schedule that they wanted to do it on, which we did not agree with,” she said. She added that she was also in favor of the changes David suggested but that they ultimately did not work.
“I frankly was very persuaded by the road diet as well, but the fact of having to push [that plan] out—possibly for years—and putting it on a future council, is what made me sort of reluctantly make the decision [I made]. It was a really hard decision,” Breen said.
The left-turn lanes have been the source of much controversy because their inclusion will necessitate the elimination of 25 parking spaces on Main Street, the Express previously reported.
The final contract including the $250,000 cost increase is not yet finished, though the council’s 3-2 vote on Monday granted Bradshaw the authority to sign it upon completion. 
Post a comment as anonymous
Report
Watch this discussion.
(16) comments
Makes ut sort of hard to figure out which local government is worst.
***** Carey.
Main Street Business owners were informed late this afternoon that Main Street access to businesses will not be possible from May 4 - May 17. That just put a lot of employees out of work for two weeks. Businesses cannot stay open as per Code, they must have two working exits on each floor. This project gets worse every day.
I was at the recent meeting. It was suggested that we take a step back and reevaluate the whole thing, but the Mayor said they polled the city about this and that is what they want...this is a lie. They could just fix the roads and sidewalks, get rid of the planned turning lane that is a total joke, and save all the street parking. But, they don't want to listen to anyone but their own voices. I heard the argument that the impetus for this is to get workers back home quicker, but when has it ever taken more than 5 minutes at rush hour to get through town. When it comes to the road itself, the Mayor is trying to fix problems that simply do not exist, and once again, it'll be at the expense of the businesses and elderly of this town. Now...let's call a spade a spade... the Mayor is doing this so he can have the bike lane he has jonesed for since the beginning...again, that is his thing as no one wants a bike path down Main St....only him.
Super misleading headline. The project is going to cost $250,000 more and it is only that much because the City is doing a lot less than they told the public they were going to do.
They will try to do the rest of the project in later years. Yet another bate and switch from Neil
@ J. Doe -Yes, but FINALLY ... a legitimate project to spend option taxes on ....
Let’s try matching the lights first before we take the parking away, like Brad Roos letter to the editor today , thanks Brad!
(Hailey`s own form of creative financing for unsupported projects allows that items in the works that are moved off schedule are also moved off budget).
Another demonstration that the Troika exerts their iron control over Ketchum and there is no "listening" done in City Hall. And if anyone seriously thinks that there won't be cost overruns on this, I have some parking spaces on Main Street I will sell you.
Are "Junior" Ketchum City Council members the ones that aren`t quite ready to vote? Or are they the ones that Mayor (and IME) don`t want you to listen to?
Did the mayor really call them "junior"? Or was it the IME author? The condescension toward these two guys in the IME (see the editorial) is beneath a newspaper if this wasn't directly from the Mayor. If it was from the mayor, that is a story of its own.
The meeting clearly shows that the Mayor will not listen to input that he disagrees with. He has two council members in his camp, so it's the Troika that will run Ketchum as they like, regardless of the public.
Down boy. The use of the adjective “Junior” is not pejorative when referring to an elected official. It merely implies that they are serving their first term in office.
(....and what does "boy" imply?)
Sorry @badger to confuse you with my use of zoomorphism, as in what you would say to an attacking dog. You have anything else besides your straw man fallacy?
No, boss.
No worries Ketchum, It`s just money.[beam]
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In